Ramos R P, Chimello D T, Chinelatti M A, Dibb R G, Mondelli J
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento Odontologia Restauradora, Av do Café, s/n Monte Alegre, Cep: 14040-904 Ribeirão Preto-SP Brasil.
Oper Dent. 2000 Sep-Oct;25(5):448-53.
This study evaluated in vitro the effectiveness of three different surface sealants (Fortify, Protect-it! and Optiguard) on the marginal sealing of Class V light-activated composite resin restorations (Prodigy). For this purpose, 20 sound noncarious human premolars extracted within a six-month period were selected. Class V cavities with the occlusal margin in enamel and cervical margin in cementum were prepared in both buccal and lingual surfaces. The teeth, randomly assigned in four groups with 10 cavities in each group, were restored with composite resin after applying an adhesive system (Optibond FL). After the finishing and polishing procedures, the restorations were covered with a specific surface sealant, except for the control samples, which were not sealed. After placing restorations, the specimens were thermocycled and immersed in a 50% silver nitrate solution (tracer agent) for eight hours, sectioned longitudinally and analyzed for leakage using an optical microscope in a blind study with three examiners. The marginal microleakage was evaluated at the occlusal and cervical interfaces and compared among the four groups using the Kruskall-Wallis and the Wilcoxon Tests. There was better sealing at the occlusal margin, and in this region, there were no statistically significant differences among the materials (p > 0.05). In the cervical region, Fortify and Protect-it! showed improved results over the Control Group, and Optiguard showed similar results to the Control Group (without sealing).
本研究在体外评估了三种不同表面封闭剂(Fortify、Protect-it! 和Optiguard)对V类光固化复合树脂修复体(Prodigy)边缘封闭的有效性。为此,选取了在六个月内拔除的20颗健康无龋的人类前磨牙。在颊面和舌面制备V类洞,咬合边缘位于釉质,颈部边缘位于牙骨质。将牙齿随机分为四组,每组10个洞,在应用粘结系统(Optibond FL)后用复合树脂修复。在完成修整和抛光程序后,除未封闭的对照样本外,修复体均覆盖特定的表面封闭剂。放置修复体后,对标本进行热循环处理,并浸入50%硝酸银溶液(示踪剂)中8小时,纵向切片,并在一项由三名检查者进行的盲法研究中使用光学显微镜分析渗漏情况。在咬合和颈部界面评估边缘微渗漏情况,并使用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Wilcoxon检验在四组之间进行比较。咬合边缘的封闭效果更好,在该区域,材料之间无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。在颈部区域,Fortify和Protect-it! 的结果优于对照组,Optiguard的结果与对照组(未封闭)相似。