Magne P, Douglas W H
Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomaterials and Biomechanics, Department of Oral Science, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Quintessence Int. 2000 Jan;31(1):5-18.
When successive restorative procedures (e.g., porcelain veneers, interdental resin composite restorations, and endodontic treatment) are carried out on the same tooth, significant effects on crown flexure can be expected.
Dentin-bonded porcelain veneers (experimental group) were assessed in vitro using functional and cyclic thermal loads. They were compared to natural teeth (control group) with respect to 2 parameters: coronal flexure (investigated using experimental strain gauges) and morphology of the tooth-restoration interface (scanning electron microscopic evaluation). For both veneered and natural teeth, crown deformation was recorded at 5 sequential experimental steps: intact tooth (baseline), Class III cavities, Class III resin composite restorations, endodontic treatment, and endodontic restoration (without posts).
No significant differences in crown flexure were found between natural and veneered incisors when compared across experimental steps. The main effect for experimental steps was highly significant. When averaged across all specimens (natural and veneered teeth), the endodontic treatment step resulted in the highest crown flexure (1.55x the baseline value). The unrestored Class III cavities and the endodontic restoration were next highest (1.30x and 1.28x the baseline value, respectively). The lowest crown flexures were found after restoration of the Class III cavities (1.13x the baseline value). No measurable microleakage or gaps were detected at the ceramic-resin, resin-enamel, or resin-dentin interfaces (Optibond FL, Kerr).
Each subsequent reduction in tooth structure resulted in a substantial increase in crown flexibility, even after restoration. Endodontic procedures were responsible for most of the loss in crown stiffness. Extensive proximal cutting and restorations seemed to minimally affect crown flexure. Porcelain veneers showed perfect biomimetic behavior, because cumulated restoration procedures had the same effect on natural and veneered incisors.
当对同一颗牙齿进行连续的修复程序(如瓷贴面、牙间树脂复合材料修复和根管治疗)时,可以预期对牙冠弯曲会产生显著影响。
使用功能性和循环热负荷对牙本质粘结瓷贴面(实验组)进行体外评估。在两个参数方面将其与天然牙(对照组)进行比较:牙冠弯曲(使用实验应变片进行研究)和牙齿修复界面的形态(扫描电子显微镜评估)。对于贴面牙和天然牙,在5个连续的实验步骤中记录牙冠变形:完整牙齿(基线)、III类洞、III类树脂复合材料修复、根管治疗和根管修复(无桩)。
在各个实验步骤中比较时,天然切牙和贴面切牙在牙冠弯曲方面未发现显著差异。实验步骤的主要影响非常显著。当对所有标本(天然牙和贴面牙)进行平均时,根管治疗步骤导致牙冠弯曲最高(基线值的1.55倍)。未修复的III类洞和根管修复次之(分别为基线值的1.30倍和1.28倍)。III类洞修复后牙冠弯曲最低(基线值的1.13倍)。在陶瓷-树脂、树脂-牙釉质或树脂-牙本质界面(Optibond FL, Kerr)未检测到可测量的微渗漏或间隙。
即使在修复后,牙齿结构的每次后续减少都会导致牙冠柔韧性大幅增加。根管治疗程序是牙冠刚度损失的主要原因。广泛的邻面切割和修复似乎对牙冠弯曲影响最小。瓷贴面表现出完美的仿生行为,因为累积的修复程序对天然切牙和贴面切牙具有相同的效果。