代偿性发音的听者转录的可靠性。
Reliability of listener transcriptions of compensatory articulations.
作者信息
Gooch J L, Hardin-Jones M, Chapman K L, Trost-Cardamone J E, Sussman J
机构信息
Department of Communication Disorders, Truman State University, Kirksville, Missouri 63501, USA.
出版信息
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001 Jan;38(1):59-67. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_2001_038_0059_roltoc_2.0.co_2.
OBJECTIVE
This study examined the ability of speech-language pathologists to transcribe compensatory articulation errors.
DESIGN
Speech-language pathologists phonetically transcribed audiorecordings of 130 monosyllabic words, 70 of which contained compensatory articulations.
PARTICIPANTS
The participants for this study were two groups of 10 speech-language pathologists. Group I included speech-language pathologists who were experienced in evaluating children with cleft palate, and group II speech-language pathologists were not.
RESULTS
Marked variability was evident across listeners, with percentages of agreement ranging from 19 to 71 (mean agreement = 41%). The experienced listeners performed significantly better on the transcription task than the inexperienced listeners, but poor interjudge agreement was evident across both groups.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study suggest that speech-language pathologists may differ in their understanding of the auditory perceptual characteristics of compensatory articulations. The results underscore the need for increased training and standardization of transcription procedures.
目的
本研究考察了言语语言病理学家转录代偿性发音错误的能力。
设计
言语语言病理学家对130个单音节词的录音进行语音转录，其中70个包含代偿性发音。
参与者
本研究的参与者为两组，每组10名言语语言病理学家。第一组包括在评估腭裂儿童方面有经验的言语语言病理学家，第二组言语语言病理学家则没有经验。
结果
不同听者之间存在明显差异，一致率从19%到71%不等（平均一致率 = 41%）。有经验的听者在转录任务中的表现明显优于无经验的听者，但两组的评判者间一致性都很差。
结论
本研究结果表明，言语语言病理学家对代偿性发音的听觉感知特征的理解可能存在差异。结果强调了加强转录程序培训和标准化的必要性。
Zotero 插件