Breebaart J, Kohlrausch A
IPO, Center for User-System Interaction, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Jan;109(1):331-45. doi: 10.1121/1.1320472.
This paper investigated the influence of stimulus uncertainty in binaural detection experiments and the predictions of several binaural models for such conditions. Masked thresholds of a 500-Hz sinusoid were measured in an NrhoSpi condition for both running and frozen-noise maskers using a three interval, forced-choice (3IFC) procedure. The nominal masker correlation varied between 0.64 and 1, and the bandwidth of the masker was either 10, 100, or 1,000 Hz. The running-noise thresholds were expected to be higher than the frozen-noise thresholds because of stimulus uncertainty in the running-noise conditions. For an interaural correlation close to +1, no difference between frozen-noise and running-noise thresholds was expected for all values of the masker bandwidth. These expectations were supported by the experimental data: for interaural correlations less than 1.0, substantial differences between frozen and running-noise conditions were observed for bandwidths of 10 and 100 Hz. Two additional conditions were tested to further investigate the influence of stimulus uncertainty. In the first condition a different masker sample was chosen on each trial, but the correlation of the masker was forced to a fixed value. In the second condition one of two independent frozen-noise maskers was randomly chosen on each trial. Results from these experiments emphasized the influence of stimulus uncertainty in binaural detection tasks: if the degree of uncertainty in binaural cues was reduced, thresholds decreased towards thresholds in the conditions without any stimulus uncertainty. In the analysis of the data, stimulus uncertainty was expressed in terms of three theories of binaural processing: the interaural correlation, the EC theory, and a model based on the processing of interaural intensity differences (IIDs) and interaural time differences (ITDs). This analysis revealed that none of the theories tested could quantitatively account for the observed thresholds. In addition, it was found that, in conditions with stimulus uncertainty, predictions based on correlation differ from those based on the EC theory.
本文研究了双耳检测实验中刺激不确定性的影响以及几种双耳模型在此类条件下的预测。使用三间隔、强制选择(3IFC)程序,在NrhoSpi条件下,针对运行噪声掩蔽器和固定噪声掩蔽器测量了500赫兹正弦波的掩蔽阈值。名义掩蔽器相关性在0.64至1之间变化,掩蔽器带宽为10、100或1000赫兹。由于运行噪声条件下的刺激不确定性,预计运行噪声阈值会高于固定噪声阈值。对于耳间相关性接近+1的情况,预计在掩蔽器带宽的所有值下,固定噪声和运行噪声阈值之间没有差异。实验数据支持了这些预期:对于耳间相关性小于1.0的情况,在10赫兹和100赫兹带宽下,观察到固定噪声和运行噪声条件之间存在显著差异。测试了另外两个条件以进一步研究刺激不确定性的影响。在第一个条件下,每次试验选择不同的掩蔽器样本,但掩蔽器的相关性被强制为固定值。在第二个条件下,每次试验随机选择两个独立固定噪声掩蔽器中的一个。这些实验的结果强调了刺激不确定性在双耳检测任务中的影响:如果双耳线索中的不确定性程度降低,阈值会朝着没有任何刺激不确定性条件下的阈值降低。在数据分析中,刺激不确定性根据三种双耳处理理论来表示:耳间相关性、EC理论以及基于耳间强度差(IID)和耳间时间差(ITD)处理的模型。该分析表明,所测试的理论均无法定量解释观察到的阈值。此外,还发现,在存在刺激不确定性的条件下,基于相关性的预测与基于EC理论的预测不同。