Patel Sadhana, Naeem Sami, Kesingland Adam, Froestl Wolfgang, Capogna Marco, Urban Laszlo, Fox Alyson
Novartis Institute for Medical Sciences, 5 Gower Place, London WC1E 6BN, UK.
Pain. 2001 Feb 15;90(3):217-226. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00404-8.
We have examined the effects of a novel GABA(B) agonist, CGP35024, in models of chronic neuropathic (partial sciatic ligation) and inflammatory (Freund's complete adjuvant) pain in the rat, and its inhibitory action on spinal transmission in vitro. The effects of CGP35024 were compared with L-baclofen and gabapentin. CGP35024 and L-baclofen reversed neuropathic mechanical hyperalgesia following single subcutaneous or intrathecal administration, but did not affect inflammatory mechanical hyperalgesia. Gabapentin only moderately affected neuropathic hyperalgesia following a single administration by either route, but produced significant reversal following daily administration for 5 days. It was only weakly active against inflammatory hyperalgesia following single or repeated administration. The antihyperalgesic effects of L-baclofen and CGP35024, but not gabapentin, were blocked by the selective GABA(B) receptor antagonist CGP56433A. CGP35024 was seven times more potent against neuropathic hyperalgesia than in the rotarod test for motor co-ordination, whilst L-baclofen was approximately equipotent in the two tests. In the isolated hemisected spinal cord from the rat, CGP35024, L-baclofen and gabapentin all inhibited capsaicin-evoked ventral root potentials (VRPs). CGP35024 and L-baclofen, but not gabapentin, also inhibited the polysynaptic and monosynaptic phases of electrically-evoked VRPs, as well as the 'wind-up' response to repetitive stimulation. These data indicate that CGP35024 and L-baclofen modulate nociceptive transmission in the spinal cord to inhibit neuropathic hyperalgesia, and that CGP35024 has a therapeutic window for antihyperalgesia over spasmolysis.
我们研究了新型γ-氨基丁酸B(GABA(B))激动剂CGP35024对大鼠慢性神经性(坐骨神经部分结扎)和炎性(弗氏完全佐剂)疼痛模型的影响,以及它在体外对脊髓传递的抑制作用。将CGP35024的作用与L-巴氯芬和加巴喷丁进行了比较。单次皮下或鞘内给药后,CGP35024和L-巴氯芬可逆转神经性机械性痛觉过敏,但不影响炎性机械性痛觉过敏。单次经任一途径给药后,加巴喷丁仅对神经性痛觉过敏有中度影响,但每日给药5天后可产生显著逆转。单次或重复给药后,它对炎性痛觉过敏的活性较弱。选择性GABA(B)受体拮抗剂CGP56433A可阻断L-巴氯芬和CGP35024的抗痛觉过敏作用,但不阻断加巴喷丁的作用。CGP35024对神经性痛觉过敏的效力比对运动协调的转棒试验高7倍,而L-巴氯芬在两项试验中的效力大致相当。在大鼠离体半横断脊髓中,CGP35024、L-巴氯芬和加巴喷丁均抑制辣椒素诱发的腹根电位(VRP)。CGP35024和L-巴氯芬,但不是加巴喷丁,还抑制电诱发VRP的多突触和单突触阶段,以及对重复刺激的“wind-up ”反应。这些数据表明,CGP35024和L-巴氯芬调节脊髓中的伤害性传递以抑制神经性痛觉过敏,并且CGP35024在抗痛觉过敏方面比解痉作用有更宽的治疗窗。