Hranchuk K B, Webster W G
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1975 Jan;88(1):368-72. doi: 10.1037/h0076193.
Interocular transfer of mirror-image discriminations has been shown to be paradoxical in split-chiasm monkeys tested in a lighted Wisconsin General Test Apparatus (WGTA) with 3-dimensional forms, but veridical in split-chiasm cats tested in a darkened 2-choice discrimination box with transilluminated patterns. In the present study, 8 split-chiasm cats showed veridical interocular transfer of a mirror-image and a non-mirror-image discrimination in a WGTA or a 2-choice discrimination box. On the basis of the testing parameters used, it is argued that the discrepancy in the literature arises from a species difference (having a behavioral rather than a gross neurological basis), and not from differences in behavioral testing apparatus or mode of stimulus presentation.
在使用三维形状在亮着的威斯康星通用测试装置（WGTA）中进行测试的裂脑猴身上，镜像辨别能力的眼间转移已被证明是自相矛盾的，但在使用透射图案在黑暗的二选一辨别箱中进行测试的裂脑猫身上，这种转移却是真实的。在本研究中，8只裂脑猫在WGTA或二选一辨别箱中表现出了镜像和非镜像辨别能力的真实眼间转移。基于所使用的测试参数，有人认为文献中的差异源于物种差异（具有行为学而非大体神经学基础），而非行为测试装置或刺激呈现方式的差异。
