Richardson D, Birge B
Department of Physiology, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky 40536-0298, USA.
Adv Physiol Educ. 2000 Dec;24(1):56-61. doi: 10.1152/advances.2000.24.1.56.
The objective of this study was to determine whether students within a large (100-160 students) didactic lecture-based course, "Elementary Physiology" (EP), who were given an active-learning opportunity would perform better on objective examinations over EP material compared with their classroom peers who did not have the same active-learning experience. This was achieved by offering the EP students the option of taking a supplemental one credit hour discussion-based course, "Case Studies in Physiology" (CSP). Approximately 14% of the EP students opted for the CSP course. The format of CSP consisted of a one-hour-per-week discussion of applied problems based on the factual information presented in EP. On a subjective scale of 1 to 4, the CSP students felt that the course helped them to understand the EP material (3.5). This was reflected in the EP examination results for which the CSP students scored significantly higher compared with their non-CSP peers (81.1% vs. 75.7%; P < 0.05). These results indicate that when active-learning methods, such as discussion of applied problems, are used as a supplement to didactic lectures in physiology, performance on objective examinations of lecture material is improved.
本研究的目的是确定在一门大型(100 - 160名学生)基于讲授的课程“基础生理学”(EP)中,获得主动学习机会的学生与没有相同主动学习经历的课堂同龄人相比,在关于EP材料的客观考试中是否表现更好。这是通过为EP学生提供参加一门补充的一学分基于讨论的课程“生理学案例研究”(CSP)来实现的。大约14%的EP学生选择了CSP课程。CSP的课程形式包括每周一小时基于EP中呈现的事实信息对应用问题的讨论。在1到4的主观评分量表上,CSP学生认为该课程帮助他们理解了EP材料(3.5分)。这反映在EP考试结果中,CSP学生的得分显著高于非CSP同龄学生(81.1%对75.7%;P < 0.05)。这些结果表明,当主动学习方法,如应用问题讨论,被用作生理学讲授课程的补充时,关于讲授材料的客观考试成绩会得到提高。