Noble J, Todd P M, Tuci E
Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jan 22;268(1463):141-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1342.
Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) transmit preferences for novel foods socially by smelling each other's breath. However, rats fail to learn aversions, acquiring a preference even if the rat whose breath they smell has been poisoned. Rats can distinguish between sick and healthy conspecifics and social learning of both preferences and aversions is present in other species - hence it is unclear why rats cannot learn aversions socially. We constructed an evolutionary simulation in which a population of rats foraged from a central location, exploiting food sites that could contain edible or toxic foodstuffs. We examined the relationship between toxin lethality and selection for individual versus social learning and discrimination between sick and healthy conspecifics in order to allow learning of both preferences and aversions. At low lethality levels individual learning was selected for and at intermediate levels we found social learning of both preferences and aversions. Finally, given high lethality levels the simulated rats would employ social learning but failed to learn aversions, matching the behaviour of real rats. We argue that Norway rats do not learn aversions socially because their environment may contain only highly lethal toxins which make interaction with a sick conspecific an extremely rare event.
褐家鼠(Rattus norvegicus)通过嗅闻彼此的气息在社交中传递对新食物的偏好。然而,大鼠无法习得厌恶,即使它们闻到气息的大鼠已被毒死,它们仍会产生偏好。大鼠能够区分生病和健康的同种个体,并且在其他物种中存在对偏好和厌恶的社会学习——因此尚不清楚为什么大鼠不能在社交中习得厌恶。我们构建了一个进化模拟,其中一群大鼠从一个中心位置觅食,开发可能包含可食用或有毒食物的食物地点。我们研究了毒素致死率与个体学习与社会学习的选择以及区分生病和健康同种个体之间的关系,以便同时学习偏好和厌恶。在低致死率水平下,选择个体学习,而在中等水平下,我们发现了对偏好和厌恶的社会学习。最后,在高致死率水平下,模拟大鼠会采用社会学习,但无法习得厌恶,这与真实大鼠的行为相符。我们认为褐家鼠不会在社交中习得厌恶,因为它们的环境可能只包含高致死性毒素,这使得与生病的同种个体互动成为极其罕见的事件。