• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂对抑郁症进行经济高效的治疗。

Cost-effective treatment of depression with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

作者信息

Panzarino P J, Nash D B

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8730 Alden Drive, Suite TH-C306, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2001 Feb;7(2):173-84.

PMID:11216334
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare factors that influence cost of antidepressant therapy between older tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and among drugs in the SSRI class.

STUDY DESIGN

Literature review.

RESULTS

Pharmacoeconomic data from the primary care and managed care settings demonstrate that the higher acquisition cost of the SSRIs is offset by reduced medical utilization because of a lower incidence of treatment-related adverse events, drug switching, and dosage adjustments than among patients taking TCAs. Analysis of pharmacy claims data suggests that drug acquisition costs, use of concomitant medications, incidence of dose titration, frequency of multitablet therapy (dose stratification), and duration of therapy are the key factors in determining the cost of SSRI therapy. Among the established SSRIs, drug acquisition costs are lowest for paroxetine and sertraline. Costs for concomitant medications may vary by healthcare plan. Recent reports indicate that paroxetine is associated with a low incidence of dose titration. Paroxetine and sertraline are available in extended dosage forms to reduce the need for multitablet therapy. Duration of therapy with all SSRIs is typically shorter than recommended.

CONCLUSION

Antidepressant therapy with SSRIs has been shown to be more cost effective than treatment with TCAs when overall healthcare utilization and expenses are considered.

摘要

目的

比较影响老年三环类抗抑郁药(TCA)和选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)之间以及SSRI类药物中各药物抗抑郁治疗费用的因素。

研究设计

文献综述。

结果

来自初级保健和管理式医疗环境的药物经济学数据表明,由于与治疗相关的不良事件、换药及剂量调整的发生率低于服用TCA的患者,SSRI较高的购置成本被医疗利用率的降低所抵消。药房索赔数据分析表明,药物购置成本、合并用药的使用、剂量滴定的发生率、多片治疗(剂量分层)的频率以及治疗持续时间是决定SSRI治疗费用的关键因素。在已有的SSRI中,帕罗西汀和舍曲林的药物购置成本最低。合并用药的费用可能因医疗保健计划而异。最近的报告表明,帕罗西汀的剂量滴定发生率较低。帕罗西汀和舍曲林有延长剂型,可减少多片治疗的需求。所有SSRI的治疗持续时间通常都短于推荐时间。

结论

当考虑总体医疗保健利用率和费用时,已证明使用SSRI进行抗抑郁治疗比使用TCA更具成本效益。

相似文献

1
Cost-effective treatment of depression with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.使用选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂对抑郁症进行经济高效的治疗。
Am J Manag Care. 2001 Feb;7(2):173-84.
2
Pharmacy and medical costs associated with switching between venlafaxine and SSRI antidepressant therapy for the treatment of major depressive disorder.文拉法辛与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)抗抑郁治疗药物相互转换治疗重度抑郁症的药学及医疗成本。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 Jun;14(5):426-41. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.5.426.
3
Sertraline. A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in depression.舍曲林。其用于治疗抑郁症的药物经济学评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 Oct;10(4):409-31. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199610040-00009.
4
Course and cost of treatment for depression with fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline.氟西汀、帕罗西汀和舍曲林治疗抑郁症的疗程及费用
Am J Manag Care. 1999 May;5(5):597-606.
5
Retrospective analysis of the health-care costs of bupropion sustained release in comparison with other antidepressants.与其他抗抑郁药相比,安非他酮缓释剂医疗成本的回顾性分析。
Value Health. 2001 Sep-Oct;4(5):362-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2001.45068.x.
6
The economics of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in depression: a critical review.抑郁症中选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的经济学:一项批判性综述。
CNS Drugs. 2001 Jan;15(1):59-83. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200115010-00005.
7
A randomised controlled trial to compare the cost-effectiveness of tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and lofepramine.一项比较三环类抗抑郁药、选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂和洛非帕明成本效益的随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2005 May;9(16):1-134, iii. doi: 10.3310/hta9160.
8
A multinational pharmacoeconomic evaluation of acute major depressive disorder (MDD): a comparison of cost-effectiveness between venlafaxine, SSRIs and TCAs.急性重度抑郁症(MDD)的多国药物经济学评估:文拉法辛、选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)和三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)的成本效益比较
Value Health. 2001 Jan-Feb;4(1):16-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2001.004001016.x.
9
One-year costs of second-line therapies for depression.抑郁症二线治疗的一年成本。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2000 Apr;61(4):290-8. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v61n0409.
10
Drug Expenditure, Price, and Utilization in the U.S. Medicaid: A Trend Analysis for SSRI and SNRI Antidepressants from 1991 to 2018.美国医疗补助计划中的药物支出、价格和利用情况:SSRIs 和 SNRIs 抗抑郁药 1991 年至 2018 年的趋势分析。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2021 Mar 1;24(1):3-11.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and efficacy of sertraline in depression among adults undergoing dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.舍曲林在接受透析的成年人抑郁症治疗中的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Oct 22;86(12):7082-7093. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002677. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
C-QUALITY: cost and quality-of-life pharmacoeconomic analysis of antidepressants used in major depressive disorder in the regional Italian settings of Veneto and Sardinia.C-QUALITY:意大利威尼托和撒丁岛地区用于治疗重度抑郁症的抗抑郁药物的成本与生活质量药物经济学分析
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Dec 3;5:611-21. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S52063. eCollection 2013.
3
Cost-effectiveness evaluation of escitalopram in major depressive disorder in Italy.
艾司西酞普兰治疗意大利重度抑郁症的成本效益评估。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013;5:87-99. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S39492. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
4
A comparison of the direct costs and cost effectiveness of serotonin reuptake inhibitors and associated adverse drug reactions.5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的直接成本、成本效益及相关药物不良反应比较
CNS Drugs. 2004;18(13):911-32. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200418130-00006.
5
Escitalopram: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in depression.艾司西酞普兰:其在抑郁症治疗中应用的药物经济学综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(16):1185-209. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321160-00004.