Alboni P, Tomasi C, Menozzi C, Bottoni N, Paparella N, Fucà G, Brignole M, Cappato R
Division of Cardiology, Ospedale Civile, Cento Fe, Italy.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Feb;37(2):548-53. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)01128-1.
We tested the efficacy of two drug treatments, flecainide (F) and the combination ofdiltiazem and propranolol (D/P), administered as a single oral dose for termination of the arrhythmic episodes.
Both prophylactic drug therapy and catheter ablation are questionable as first-line treatments in patients with infrequent and well-tolerated episodes of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT).
Among 42 eligible patients (13% of all screened for SVT) with infrequent (< or =5/year), well-tolerated and long-lasting episodes, 37 were enrolled and 33 had SVT inducible during electrophysiological study. In the latter, three treatments (placebo, F, and D/P) were administered in a random order 5 min after SVT induction on three different days.
Conversion to sinus rhythm occurred within 2 h in 52%, 61%, and 94% of patients on placebo, F and D/P, respectively (p < 0.001). The conversion time was shorter after D/P (32 +/- 22 min) than after placebo (77 +/- 42 min, p < 0.001) or F (74 +/- 37 min, p < 0.001). Four patients (1 placebo, 1 D/P, and 2 F) had hypotension and four (3 D/P and 1 F) a sinus rate <50 beats/min following SVT interruption. Patients were discharged on a single oral dose of the most effective drug treatment (F or D/P) at time of acute testing. Twenty-six patients were discharged on D/P and five on F. During 17 +/- 12 months follow-up, the treatment was successful in 81% of D/P patients and in 80% of F patients, as all the arrhythmic episodes were interrupted out-of-hospital within 2 h. In the remaining patients, a failure occurred during one or more episodes because of drug ineffectiveness or drug unavailability. One patient had syncope after D/P ingestion. During follow-up, the percentage of patients calling for emergency room assistance was significantly reduced as compared to the year before enrollment (9% vs. 100%, p < 0.0001).
The episodic treatment with oral D/P and F, as assessed during acute testing, appears effective in the management of selected patients with SVT. This therapeutic strategy minimizes the need for emergency room admissions during tachycardia recurrences.
我们测试了两种药物治疗方法的疗效,即单次口服氟卡尼(F)以及地尔硫䓬与普萘洛尔联合用药(D/P),用于终止心律失常发作。
对于阵发性室上性心动过速(SVT)发作不频繁且耐受性良好的患者,预防性药物治疗和导管消融作为一线治疗方法都存在疑问。
在42例符合条件的患者(占所有SVT筛查患者的13%)中,发作不频繁(每年≤5次)、耐受性良好且发作持续时间长,37例患者入组,33例在电生理研究中可诱发SVT。在后者中,三种治疗方法(安慰剂、F和D/P)在SVT诱发后5分钟,于三个不同日期随机给药。
安慰剂组、F组和D/P组分别有52%、61%和94%的患者在2小时内转为窦性心律(p<0.001)。D/P组的转复时间(32±22分钟)比安慰剂组(77±42分钟,p<0.001)或F组(74±37分钟,p<0.001)短。4例患者(1例安慰剂组、1例D/P组和2例F组)在SVT中断后出现低血压,4例(3例D/P组和1例F组)窦性心率<50次/分钟。急性测试时,患者出院时服用单次口服最有效的药物治疗(F或D/P)。26例患者出院时服用D/P,5例服用F。在17±12个月的随访期间,D/P组81%的患者和F组80%的患者治疗成功,因为所有心律失常发作均在院外2小时内中断。其余患者中,由于药物无效或无法获得药物,在一次或多次发作中出现治疗失败。1例患者在服用D/P后出现晕厥。随访期间,与入组前一年相比,呼叫急诊室协助的患者百分比显著降低(9%对100%,p<0.0001)。
如急性测试期间所评估的,口服D/P和F的发作性治疗似乎对选定的SVT患者有效。这种治疗策略最大限度地减少了心动过速复发时急诊室入院的需求。