• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联盟建设的复杂性:领导者的成功、策略、困境及解决方案。

Complexities of coalition building: leaders' successes, strategies, struggles, and solutions.

作者信息

Mizrahi T, Rosenthal B B

机构信息

Education Center for Community Organizing, Hunter College School of Social Work, 129 East 79th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.

出版信息

Soc Work. 2001 Jan;46(1):63-78. doi: 10.1093/sw/46.1.63.

DOI:10.1093/sw/46.1.63
PMID:11217495
Abstract

Government and private funding initiatives are promoting coalitions, collaborations, and other interorganizational approaches to address complex community, social services, and health issues. Social work organizers and administrators are increasingly leading coalitions themselves or representing their organizations in collaborative planning and problem solving, often without understanding how to manage the complexities involved in interorganizational relationships. This article reports on aspects of a larger quantitative and qualitative research project that studied coalition dynamics, operations, and outcomes. Coalition leaders interviewed defined success in multiple ways. Competent leadership was the factor most often identified with coalition success.

摘要

政府和私人资助倡议正在推动各方联合、合作以及采取其他组织间方法,以解决复杂的社区、社会服务和健康问题。社会工作组织者和管理人员越来越多地亲自领导联合行动,或在合作规划与问题解决中代表自己的组织,但他们往往不了解如何应对组织间关系中涉及的复杂性。本文报道了一个更大规模的定量和定性研究项目的相关方面,该项目研究了联合行动的动态、运作和成果。接受采访的联合行动领导人以多种方式定义成功。能干的领导是最常被认为与联合行动成功相关的因素。

相似文献

1
Complexities of coalition building: leaders' successes, strategies, struggles, and solutions.联盟建设的复杂性:领导者的成功、策略、困境及解决方案。
Soc Work. 2001 Jan;46(1):63-78. doi: 10.1093/sw/46.1.63.
2
Building successful coalitions for promoting advance care planning.建立促进预先护理计划的成功联盟。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2006 Mar-Apr;23(2):119-26. doi: 10.1177/104990910602300209.
3
Building successful coalitions to promote advance care planning.建立成功的联盟以促进预立医疗计划。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2005 Nov-Dec;22(6):437-41. doi: 10.1177/104990910502200609.
4
How does community context influence coalitions in the formation stage? A multiple case study based on the Community Coalition Action Theory.社区环境如何影响形成阶段的联盟?基于社区联盟行动理论的多案例研究。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Feb 23;10:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-90.
5
The Culture of Health Survey: a qualitative assessment of a diabetes prevention coalition.健康文化调查:对糖尿病预防联盟的定性评估。
J Community Health. 2010 Feb;35(1):4-9. doi: 10.1007/s10900-009-9198-9.
6
Creating a community coalition to address violence.创建一个社区联盟来应对暴力问题。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2008 Jul;29(7):755-65. doi: 10.1080/01612840802129202.
7
Reducing diabetes health disparities through community-based participatory action research: the Chicago Southeast Diabetes Community Action Coalition.通过基于社区的参与性行动研究减少糖尿病健康差异:芝加哥东南部糖尿病社区行动联盟
Public Health Rep. 2003 Jul-Aug;118(4):309-23. doi: 10.1093/phr/118.4.309.
8
Who's who in the crew? Exploring participant involvement in the Active Living Coalition.团队成员都有谁?探索积极生活联盟中的参与者参与情况。
Eval Program Plann. 2015 Jun;50:88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
9
The effects of leadership and governance processes on member participation in community health coalitions.领导与治理过程对社区卫生联盟成员参与度的影响。
Health Educ Behav. 2005 Aug;32(4):455-73. doi: 10.1177/1090198104271967.
10
What coalition factors foster community capacity? Lessons learned from the Fighting Back Initiative.哪些联盟因素促进了社区能力?从“反击倡议”中吸取的经验教训。
Health Educ Behav. 2007 Apr;34(2):354-75. doi: 10.1177/1090198106288492. Epub 2006 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing a Community Partnership Addressing Food Security Among Older Adults During COVID-19.评估新冠疫情期间一个解决老年人粮食安全问题的社区伙伴关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 26;22(2):163. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020163.
2
United for health to improve urban food environments across five underserved communities: a cross-sector coalition approach.为改善五个服务不足社区的城市食品环境而团结协作:跨部门联盟方法。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 4;22(1):888. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13245-2.
3
The Urban Youth Trauma Center: A Trauma-Informed Continuum for Addressing Community Violence Among Youth.
城市青年创伤中心:一个关注创伤的连续体,用于应对青年群体中的社区暴力问题。
Community Ment Health J. 2022 Feb;58(2):334-342. doi: 10.1007/s10597-021-00827-4. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
4
Factors Affecting Member Perceptions of Coalition Impact.影响成员对联盟影响认知的因素。
Nonprofit Manag Leadersh. 2009 Spring;19(3):327-348. doi: 10.1002/nml.222. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
5
Stakeholder Education for Community-Wide Health Initiatives: A Focus on Teen Pregnancy Prevention.面向全社区健康倡议的利益相关者教育:聚焦青少年怀孕预防
Health Promot Pract. 2018 Jan;19(1):38-50. doi: 10.1177/1524839917734521. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
6
Catalyzing Implementation of Evidence-Based Interventions in Safety Net Settings: A Clinical-Community Partnership in South Los Angeles.在安全网环境中推动基于证据的干预措施的实施:洛杉矶南部的临床-社区合作项目
Health Promot Pract. 2017 Jul;18(4):586-597. doi: 10.1177/1524839917705418. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
7
Advocacy coalitions involved in California's menu labeling policy debate: Exploring coalition structure, policy beliefs, resources, and strategies.参与加利福尼亚州菜单标签政策辩论的倡导联盟:探索联盟结构、政策信念、资源和策略。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Mar;177:78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.036. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
8
Community coalition-driven interventions to reduce health disparities among racial and ethnic minority populations.由社区联盟推动的干预措施,以减少种族和少数族裔人群之间的健康差距。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 15;2015(6):CD009905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009905.pub2.
9
Building Local Infrastructure for Community Adoption of Science-Based Prevention: The Role of Coalition Functioning.构建社区采用基于科学的预防措施的本地基础设施:联盟运作的作用。
Prev Sci. 2015 Nov;16(8):1136-46. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0562-y.
10
Relating coalition capacity to the adoption of science-based prevention in communities: evidence from a randomized trial of Communities That Care.将联盟能力与社区采用基于科学的预防措施相关联:来自“关爱社区”随机试验的证据。
Am J Community Psychol. 2015 Mar;55(1-2):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s10464-014-9684-9.