Suppr超能文献

将联盟能力与社区采用基于科学的预防措施相关联:来自“关爱社区”随机试验的证据。

Relating coalition capacity to the adoption of science-based prevention in communities: evidence from a randomized trial of Communities That Care.

作者信息

Shapiro Valerie B, Oesterle Sabrina, Hawkins J David

机构信息

School of Social Welfare, University of California at Berkeley, 120 Haviland Hall #7400, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA,

出版信息

Am J Community Psychol. 2015 Mar;55(1-2):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s10464-014-9684-9.

Abstract

Coalition-based efforts that use a science-based approach to prevention can improve the wellbeing of community youth. This study measured several coalition capacities that are hypothesized to facilitate the adoption of a science-based approach to prevention in communities. Using data from 12 coalitions participating in a community-randomized trial of the prevention strategy Communities That Care (CTC), this paper describes select measurement properties of five salient coalition capacities (member substantive knowledge of prevention, member acquisition of new skills, member attitudes toward CTC, organizational linkages, and influence on organizations), as reported by coalition members, and examines the degree to which these capacities facilitated the community leader reports of the community-wide adoption of a science-based approach to prevention. Findings indicated that the five coalition capacities could be reliably measured using coalition member reports. Meta-regression analyses found that CTC had a greater impact on the adoption of a science-based prevention approach in 12 matched pairs of control and CTC communities where the CTC coalition had greater member (new skill acquisition) and organizational capacities (organizational linkages).

摘要

基于联盟的努力,若采用基于科学的预防方法,可改善社区青少年的福祉。本研究衡量了几个联盟能力,这些能力被假定有助于在社区采用基于科学的预防方法。利用参与预防策略“关爱社区”(CTC)社区随机试验的12个联盟的数据,本文描述了联盟成员报告的五个显著联盟能力(成员对预防的实质性知识、成员新技能的获得、成员对CTC的态度、组织联系以及对组织的影响)的选定测量属性,并考察了这些能力在多大程度上促进了社区领导者报告的全社区采用基于科学的预防方法。研究结果表明,联盟成员的报告能够可靠地衡量这五个联盟能力。元回归分析发现,在12对匹配的对照社区和CTC社区中,当CTC联盟具有更强的成员(新技能获得)和组织能力(组织联系)时,CTC对采用基于科学的预防方法有更大影响。

相似文献

6
Promoting community coalition functioning: effects of Project STEP.促进社区联盟运作:STEP项目的效果
Prev Sci. 2008 Jun;9(2):63-72. doi: 10.1007/s11121-008-0088-7. Epub 2008 May 16.

引用本文的文献

6
Community Readiness to Prevent Opioid Overdose.社区预防阿片类药物过量的准备情况。
Health Promot Pract. 2018 Sep;19(5):747-755. doi: 10.1177/1524839918756887. Epub 2018 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors Affecting Member Perceptions of Coalition Impact.影响成员对联盟影响认知的因素。
Nonprofit Manag Leadersh. 2009 Spring;19(3):327-348. doi: 10.1002/nml.222. Epub 2009 Mar 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验