Noguchi M
The Operation Center, Kanazawa University Hospital, School of Medicine, Kanazawa University, Japan.
J Surg Oncol. 2001 Feb;76(2):144-56. doi: 10.1002/1096-9098(200102)76:2<144::aid-jso1028>3.0.co;2-h.
Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a useful way of assessing axillary nodal status and obviating axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with node-negative breast cancer. Because SLN technology is evolving rapidly, however, variation in technique is widespread, and no standardization has yet been accomplished. This review discusses the feasibility and accuracy of this procedure and suggests the optimal method for identifying the SLN and detecting micrometastases. Although the SLN can be successfully identified by either the dye-guided or gamma probe-guided method in experienced hands, identification is facilitated when the two techniques are used together. In the gamma probe-guided method, the use of a large-sized radiotracer (particle size, 200-1000 nm) may be preferred because only one or two SLNs are identified. To increase the chance of finding metastases in SLN, it is desirable to make step sections with hematoxylin and eosin staining on permanent and frozen sections. The addition of immunohistochemistry may improve the accuracy of SLN diagnosis. The intraoperative examination of imprint cytology may be useful in determining the status of the SLNs, but further studies are needed to establish whether it has additional value when combined with the frozen section. In practice, routine ALND can be avoided when there is documentation of extensive experience and a low false-negative rate with the technique in the hands of a particular surgeon and hospital team. Particularly, SLN biopsy is more successful and has a lower false-negative rate in patients with smaller tumors. However, investigation of long-term regional control and survival in a prospective randomized trial is necessary, before SLN biopsy can replace routine ALND as the preferred staging operation for women with breast cancer.
前哨淋巴结(SLN)活检是评估腋窝淋巴结状态以及避免对淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者进行腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)的一种有效方法。然而,由于SLN技术发展迅速,技术差异广泛存在,尚未实现标准化。本文综述讨论了该手术的可行性和准确性,并提出了识别SLN和检测微转移的最佳方法。虽然在经验丰富的医生手中,通过染料引导或γ探针引导方法均可成功识别SLN,但将这两种技术联合使用时识别会更容易。在γ探针引导方法中,可能更倾向于使用大尺寸放射性示踪剂(粒径200 - 1000 nm),因为这样仅能识别一两个SLN。为增加在SLN中发现转移灶的机会,对永久切片和冰冻切片进行苏木精和伊红染色并制作连续切片是可取的。添加免疫组织化学可能会提高SLN诊断的准确性。术中印片细胞学检查可能有助于确定SLN的状态,但需要进一步研究以确定其与冰冻切片联合使用时是否具有额外价值。在实际操作中,当有特定外科医生和医院团队在该技术方面经验丰富且假阴性率低的记录时,可避免常规ALND。特别是,SLN活检在肿瘤较小的患者中更成功且假阴性率更低。然而,在SLN活检能够取代常规ALND成为乳腺癌女性首选的分期手术之前,有必要在前瞻性随机试验中对长期区域控制和生存率进行研究。