Andrews J.S., Stephens D.N.
Research Laboratories, Schering AG, Berlin, Germany.
Behav Pharmacol. 1991 Jun;2(3):171-185.
Separate groups of rats were trained to discriminate one of three benzodiazepine receptor ligands from vehicle. The three ligands used, the benzodiazepine chlordiazepoxide, and the beta-carboline partial agonists ZK 95962 and abecarnil, have been reported to have different agonistic profiles. All three ligands formed specific benzodiazepine-receptor mediated discriminative stimuli antagonizable by at least one benzodiazepine antagonist. Different patterns of generalization were observed for each cue. As reported previously full and partial agonists substituted for chlordiazepoxide, whereas generalization to ZK 95962 was obtained more readily with partial agonists and antagonists with weak partial agonist activity. In contrast to the other two cues, the abecarnil discriminative stimulus was difficult to train and was unstable over time. Additionally, the abecarnil cue showed commonalities only with sedative or BZ1 receptor agonists. These results demonstrate qualitative differences between different benzodiazepine receptor ligands dependent on the intrinsic activity of the compound used.
将大鼠分成不同组,训练它们区分三种苯二氮䓬受体配体中的一种与赋形剂。所使用的三种配体,即苯二氮䓬类药物氯氮卓,以及β-咔啉部分激动剂ZK 95962和阿贝卡尼,据报道具有不同的激动剂特征。所有三种配体都形成了特定的苯二氮䓬受体介导的辨别性刺激,至少有一种苯二氮䓬拮抗剂可拮抗这种刺激。每种线索都观察到了不同的泛化模式。如先前报道,完全激动剂和部分激动剂可替代氯氮卓,而部分激动剂和具有弱部分激动剂活性的拮抗剂更容易出现对ZK 95962的泛化。与其他两种线索不同,阿贝卡尼辨别性刺激难以训练且随时间不稳定。此外,阿贝卡尼线索仅与镇静剂或BZ1受体激动剂有共同之处。这些结果表明,不同苯二氮䓬受体配体之间存在质的差异,这取决于所使用化合物的内在活性。