Lytle D A, Emmett-Oglesby M W, Stephens D N
Department of Pharmacology, University of North Texas HSC, Fort Worth 76107-2699, USA.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1995 Oct;121(3):339-46. doi: 10.1007/BF02246073.
Abecarnil (ABC) is a beta-carboline that acts as an agonist at benzodiazepine (BZD) receptors. It possesses anxiolytic and anticonvulsant properties, but produces little sedation and is without muscle relaxant effects. To explain this unusual profile of activity, two hypotheses have been advanced: either 1) ABC acts as a partial agonist or 2) ABC acts as a full agonist, but only at a sub-population of BZD receptors. The present experiment used cross-tolerance profiles between BZDs and ABC to differentiate these hypotheses based upon predictions of receptor theory: tolerance produced to a full agonist should confer even greater cross-tolerance to a partial agonsit. Rats were trained in a three-choice drug discrimination procedure to detect the benzodiazepine, midazolam (MDZ, 1.0 mg/kg) from pentylenetetrazole (PTZ, 20 mg/kg) from saline. Tested acutely, MDZ and ABC substituted for MDZ with similar potencies. Following chronic treatment with the BZD-agonist diazepam (DZP; 20 mg/kg per 8 h for 7 days), both the MDZ and ABC dose-effect curves were significantly shifted to the right, and both drugs showed a comparable three-fold decrease in potency. The chronic administration of ABC (4.0 mg/kg per 8 h for 7 days) produced a different spectrum of results. No significant shift occurred in the MDZ dose-effect curve, but there was a significant seven-fold shift to the right of the ABC dose-effect curve. Throughout all test, PTZ-lever responding rarely occurred and did not account for more than 20% of lever selections for any individual test. These data support the hypothesis that ABC acts as a full agonist at a sub-population of BZD receptors, which mediate its substitution for MDZ.
阿贝卡尼(ABC)是一种β-咔啉,可作为苯二氮䓬(BZD)受体的激动剂。它具有抗焦虑和抗惊厥特性,但几乎不产生镇静作用,也没有肌肉松弛效果。为了解释这种不寻常的活性特征,提出了两种假设:要么1)ABC作为部分激动剂起作用,要么2)ABC作为完全激动剂起作用,但仅作用于BZD受体的一个亚群。本实验利用BZDs和ABC之间的交叉耐受性特征,根据受体理论的预测来区分这些假设:对完全激动剂产生的耐受性应赋予对部分激动剂更大的交叉耐受性。在三选一药物辨别程序中训练大鼠,以区分苯二氮䓬咪达唑仑(MDZ,1.0mg/kg)、戊四氮(PTZ,20mg/kg)和生理盐水。急性测试时,MDZ和ABC以相似的效力替代MDZ。在用BZD激动剂地西泮(DZP;每8小时20mg/kg,共7天)进行慢性治疗后,MDZ和ABC的剂量-效应曲线均显著右移,两种药物的效力均下降了约三倍。慢性给予ABC(每8小时4. mg/kg,共7天)产生了不同的结果。MDZ剂量-效应曲线没有显著变化,但ABC剂量-效应曲线显著右移了七倍。在所有测试中,PTZ杠杆反应很少发生,在任何一次单独测试中,其占杠杆选择的比例都不超过20%。这些数据支持了ABC作为BZD受体亚群的完全激动剂起作用的假设,该亚群介导了其对MDZ的替代作用。