Tandoğan I, Yetkin E, Ileri M, Ortapamuk H, Yanik A, Cehreli S, Duru E
Türkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Hospital Department of Cardiology, Ankara, Turkey.
Angiology. 2001 Feb;52(2):103-8. doi: 10.1177/000331970105200203.
Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a strong predictor of mortality in the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD). Noninvasive evaluation of CAD in these patients has some difficulties. Exercise-induced electrocardiographic ST segment changes are nondiagnostic, and several scintigraphic studies have reported false-positive anteroseptal and septal perfusion defects up to 80%. The authors aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of thallium-201 (Tl-201) exercise myocardial single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) in comparison with coronary angiography (CAG) for detection of CAD in patients with LBBB. Seventy-seven consecutive patients suffering from chest pain with complete and permanent LBBB were included in the study. All patients (40 women, 37 men, mean age = 54 +/- 7 years) were studied with Tl-201 exercise SPECT and coronary angiography. Tl-201 exercise SPECT for diagnosis of left anterior descending (LAD) artery lesions was interpreted by using three different approaches: method A (conventional approach), method B (involvement of anterior and septal wall regardless of apical wall), and method C (apical approach: involvement of anterior septal and apical wall). Methods A and B gave a sensitivity of 100% each but a specificity of 47% and 56%, respectively. Although method C gave a higher value of specificity than that of methods A and B (98% vs 47% and 56%, respectively p < 0.05), the sensitivity of method C significantly decreased in respect to methods A and B (33% vs 100% p < 0.01). Isolated septal defects were evaluated separately. Isolated septal defects on exercise Tl-201 SPECT were detected in 11 patients, and none of them had CAD according to CAG results. Isolated septal wall involvement had a sensitivity of 0% and a specificity of 74%. The sensitivity and specificity of Tl-201 SPECT for diagnosis of CAD in the right coronary and left circumflex artery territories were 91% and 89%, respectively. In conclusion, the apical approach increased the specificity and decreased the sensitivity of the test. Isolated septal defects seem to have no value for diagnosis of CAD in patients with left bundle branch block.
左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)是冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者死亡率的有力预测指标。对这些患者进行CAD的无创评估存在一些困难。运动诱发的心电图ST段改变无法用于诊断,多项闪烁扫描研究报告称,前间隔和间隔灌注缺损的假阳性率高达80%。作者旨在评估与冠状动脉造影(CAG)相比,铊-201(Tl-201)运动心肌单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)在检测LBBB患者CAD方面的诊断准确性。本研究纳入了77例连续的胸痛伴完全性永久性LBBB患者。所有患者(40名女性,37名男性,平均年龄=54±7岁)均接受了Tl-201运动SPECT和冠状动脉造影检查。采用三种不同方法解读用于诊断左前降支(LAD)动脉病变的Tl-201运动SPECT:方法A(传统方法)、方法B(无论心尖壁如何,累及前壁和间隔壁)和方法C(心尖方法:累及前间隔和心尖壁)。方法A和B的敏感性均为100%,但特异性分别为47%和56%。尽管方法C的特异性值高于方法A和B(分别为98%、47%和56%,p<0.05),但方法C的敏感性相对于方法A和B显著降低(分别为33%、100%,p<0.01)。对孤立的间隔缺损进行了单独评估。运动Tl-201 SPECT上检测到11例孤立的间隔缺损,根据CAG结果,他们均无CAD。孤立的间隔壁受累敏感性为0%,特异性为74%。Tl-201 SPECT诊断右冠状动脉和左旋支动脉区域CAD的敏感性和特异性分别为91%和89%。总之,心尖方法提高了检测的特异性,但降低了敏感性。孤立的间隔缺损似乎对左束支传导阻滞患者CAD的诊断没有价值。