Rubino C A
Hamilton College, 198 College Hill Road, Clinton, NY 13323, USA.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2000 Oct;6(4):499-508; discussion 509-10. doi: 10.1007/s11948-000-0008-0.
The prestige of science, derived from its claims to certainty, has adversely affected the humanities. There is, in fact, a "politics of certainty". Our ability to predict events in a limited sphere has been idealized, engendering dangerous illusions about our power to control nature and eliminate time. In addition, the perception and propagation of science as a bearer of certainty has served to legitimate harmful forms of social, sexual, and political power. Yet, as Ilya Prigogine has argued, renewed attention to the irreducible reality of time has brought us to "the end of certainty". As we enter the age of uncertainty, there is disagreement about how science should be understood and communicated. Some scientists cling to the ideal of certainty, while others emphasize the creative potential of spontaneity, novelty, and surprise.
科学的威望源于其对确定性的主张,这对人文学科产生了不利影响。事实上,存在一种“确定性政治”。我们在有限领域预测事件的能力被理想化了,这引发了关于我们控制自然和消除时间能力的危险幻觉。此外,将科学视为确定性承载者的观念及其传播,为有害的社会、性和政治权力形式提供了合法性。然而,正如伊利亚·普里戈金所主张的,对时间不可简化的现实的重新关注使我们走到了“确定性的终结”。随着我们进入不确定性时代,对于应该如何理解和传播科学存在分歧。一些科学家坚持确定性的理想,而另一些人则强调自发性、新颖性和惊喜的创造潜力。