• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性支气管炎急性加重的工作场所成本:莫西沙星与左氧氟沙星的比较

Workplace costs associated with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis: a comparison of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin.

作者信息

Li-McLeod J, Perfetto E M

机构信息

Bayer Corporation, West Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Manag Care Interface. 2001 Feb;14(2):52-9.

PMID:11228817
Abstract

Past research on acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) has not quantified related work loss. This exploratory study used data from a comparative trial of moxifloxacin versus levofloxacin to examine and compare workplace-related indirect costs. Both groups reported considerable absenteeism and lowered work productivity. However, patients taking moxifloxacin reported significantly higher work productivity than those taking levofloxacin (70% vs. 50%; P = .03). This translated into substantial indirect cost savings with moxifloxacin of $726/patient/year. Antibiotic choice in AECB can affect worker productivity and workplace-related indirect costs. Both insurers and employers should consider workplace-related indirect costs in addition to direct medical expenses when making formulary selections.

摘要

过去对慢性支气管炎急性加重(AECB)的研究未对相关工作损失进行量化。这项探索性研究使用了莫西沙星与左氧氟沙星对比试验的数据,以检查和比较与工作场所相关的间接成本。两组均报告了相当多的旷工情况以及工作效率降低。然而,服用莫西沙星的患者报告的工作效率显著高于服用左氧氟沙星的患者(70%对50%;P = .03)。这意味着使用莫西沙星可使每位患者每年间接成本大幅节省726美元。AECB治疗中抗生素的选择会影响员工生产力和与工作场所相关的间接成本。保险公司和雇主在进行处方选择时,除了直接医疗费用外,都应考虑与工作场所相关的间接成本。

相似文献

1
Workplace costs associated with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis: a comparison of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin.慢性支气管炎急性加重的工作场所成本:莫西沙星与左氧氟沙星的比较
Manag Care Interface. 2001 Feb;14(2):52-9.
2
Moxifloxacin versus levofloxacin against acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: the Latin American Cohort.莫西沙星与左氧氟沙星治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重:拉丁美洲队列研究
Respir Med. 2006 Sep;100(9):1504-11. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.01.013. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
3
A comparison of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin use in hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients in the US: focus on length of stay.美国住院社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者使用左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星的比较:以住院时间为重点。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Mar;24(3):895-906. doi: 10.1185/030079908X273408.
4
Modeling the impact of enhanced depression treatment on workplace functioning and costs: a cost-benefit approach.模拟强化抑郁症治疗对工作场所功能和成本的影响:一种成本效益方法。
Med Care. 2006 Apr;44(4):352-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000204049.30620.1e.
5
The impact of a worksite migraine intervention program on work productivity, productivity costs, and non-workplace impairment among Spanish postal service employees from an employer perspective.从雇主角度看,工作场所偏头痛干预项目对西班牙邮政员工工作效率、生产力成本及非工作场所损伤的影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Nov;20(11):1805-14. doi: 10.1185/030079904X10151.
6
Indirect cost of ischemic heart disease to employers.缺血性心脏病给雇主带来的间接成本。
Am J Manag Care. 2001 Jan;7(1):27-34.
7
[Socioeconomic relevance of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis in the Federal Republic of Germany. A prospective cost of illness study].
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2001 Mar 30;126(13):353-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-12393.
8
Total costs of IBS: employer and managed care perspective.肠易激综合征的总成本:雇主和管理式医疗视角。
Am J Manag Care. 2005 Apr;11(1 Suppl):S7-16.
9
The economic impact of GERD and PUD: examination of direct and indirect costs using a large integrated employer claims database.胃食管反流病和消化性溃疡的经济影响:使用大型综合雇主索赔数据库对直接和间接成本进行考察。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Apr;21(4):535-44. doi: 10.1185/030079905X38240.
10
A 1-year community-based health economic study of ciprofloxacin vs usual antibiotic treatment in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: the Canadian Ciprofloxacin Health Economic Study Group.一项为期1年的基于社区的健康经济学研究:环丙沙星与常规抗生素治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重的比较——加拿大环丙沙星健康经济学研究小组
Chest. 1998 Jan;113(1):131-41. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.1.131.

引用本文的文献

1
Speed of recovery from acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease after treatment with antimicrobials : results of a two-year study.抗生素治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重后恢复速度:一项为期两年的研究结果。
Clin Drug Investig. 2003;23(7):439-50. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200323070-00003.
2
Daily-practice treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis with moxifloxacin in a large cohort in Germany.在德国一项大型队列研究中,莫西沙星在慢性支气管炎急性加重症的日常治疗中的应用。
Clin Drug Investig. 2004;24(8):449-55. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200424080-00003.
3
Moxifloxacin: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections.
莫西沙星:其在细菌感染治疗中的应用综述
Drugs. 2004;64(20):2347-77. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464200-00006.
4
Lower respiratory tract infections: impact on the workplace.下呼吸道感染:对工作场所的影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(10):749-59. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321100-00006.
5
Cost-effective approaches to the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in the era of resistance.耐药时代社区获得性肺炎的经济有效治疗方法。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(8):513-28. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220080-00002.