Laux G
Bezirkskrankenhaus Gabersee, Wasserburg am Inn, Germany.
Pharmacopsychiatry. 2001 Jan;34(1):1-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-15193.
Changes in the social and health services over the last years have forced doctors to concern themselves with cost benefit calculations and budget forecasting. Cost considerations are a (co-) determinant in the choice of antidepressants as well as neuroleptics and/or antipsychotics. In recent years, pharmacoeconomic studies have been performed to answer the question as to what extent treatment with new antidepressants, in particular SSRIs, is actually less expensive than treatment with (generic) tricyclic antidepressants due to better safety profiles and higher compliance in spite of the considerably higher retail price. Following descriptions of the methodological principles, the currently available studies are presented and discussed critically in this report. It can be stated that the economic value of different antidepressants can not be decided definitively at the present time. The available data do not allow the conclusion that SSRIs should be preferred over tricyclic antidepressants with the argument that the treatment as a whole is more cost effective in spite of the higher costs.
过去几年社会和医疗服务的变化迫使医生关注成本效益计算和预算预测。成本考量是选择抗抑郁药以及抗精神病药和/或安定药的一个(共同)决定因素。近年来,已经开展了药物经济学研究,以回答由于安全性更好和依从性更高,尽管新抗抑郁药,特别是选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)的零售价要高得多,但使用它们进行治疗实际上是否比使用(非专利)三环类抗抑郁药治疗成本更低的问题。在描述了方法学原则之后,本报告将对目前可得的研究进行介绍并进行批判性讨论。可以说,目前还无法最终确定不同抗抑郁药的经济价值。现有数据无法得出结论认为,尽管成本较高,但由于整体治疗更具成本效益,因此应优先选择SSRI而非三环类抗抑郁药。