Suppr超能文献

改革以色列医疗体系:一项为期三年的评估结果

Reforming the Israeli health system: findings of a 3-year evaluation.

作者信息

Gross R, Rosen B, Shirom A

机构信息

JDC-Brookdale Institute, P.O.B. 13087, 91130, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2001 Apr;56(1):1-20. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00147-0.

Abstract

Israel, like many other European countries, has recently reformed its health care system. The regulated market created by the National Health Insurance (NHI) law embodies many of the principles of managed competition. The purpose of this paper is to present initial findings from an evaluation of the first 3 years of the reform (1995-1997) regarding the implementation of the reform and the extent to which it has achieved its main goals. The evaluation was conducted using multiple quantitative and qualitative research tools: interviews with key informants; analysis of documents and sick fund financial statements; analysis of trends in sick fund membership; and population surveys conducted in 1995 and 1997 to assess the impact of the reform on outcome measures related to level of services to the public. Data from the evaluation show that the NHI law achieved a considerable number of its goals: to provide insurance coverage for the entire population, to ensure freedom of movement among sick funds, and to standardize the way resources are allocated to sick funds. The incentives that are embodied in the law have encouraged the sick funds to improve the level of services provided to the average insuree, and to develop services in the periphery and for some of the weaker populations. From the financial perspective, concerns that NHI would lead to a rise in the national health expenditure were not realized as of 1997. In the wake of NHI, there has been a decline in the age adjusted per capita expenditure in three sick funds, with no reports by insurees, at least through 1997, on a decline in satisfaction or level of service. However, the Israeli experience shows that regulating competition does not necessarily lead to economic stability and equality. Regulating the competition also did not solve some of the major policy issues in the Israeli health system including level of resources allocated to health, organizational structure of the hospital system, manpower planning and the extent of government involvement in system. Additional policy changes may be needed to resolve these issues. Up-to-date information is essential in helping policymakers track the process of reform implementation and results, and identify problems which need to be addressed in the future.

摘要

以色列与许多其他欧洲国家一样,最近对其医疗保健系统进行了改革。国家医疗保险(NHI)法所创建的规范市场体现了管理式竞争的许多原则。本文的目的是呈现对改革头三年(1995 - 1997年)进行评估的初步结果,内容涉及改革的实施情况以及在多大程度上实现了其主要目标。评估采用了多种定量和定性研究工具:与关键信息提供者进行访谈;分析文件和疾病基金财务报表;分析疾病基金会员趋势;以及在1995年和1997年进行人口调查,以评估改革对与向公众提供服务水平相关的结果指标的影响。评估数据表明,NHI法实现了相当数量的目标:为全体人口提供保险覆盖,确保在各疾病基金之间的就医自由,并规范向疾病基金分配资源的方式。该法律所体现的激励措施促使疾病基金提高向普通参保人提供的服务水平,并在外围地区以及为一些弱势群体发展服务。从财务角度来看,截至1997年,关于NHI会导致国家医疗支出增加的担忧并未成为现实。在实施NHI之后,三个疾病基金的年龄调整后人均支出有所下降,至少到1997年,参保人没有报告满意度或服务水平下降的情况。然而,以色列的经验表明,规范竞争并不一定能带来经济稳定和平等。规范竞争也未能解决以色列医疗系统中的一些主要政策问题,包括分配给医疗的资源水平、医院系统的组织结构、人力规划以及政府对该系统的参与程度。可能需要进一步的政策变革来解决这些问题。最新信息对于帮助政策制定者跟踪改革实施过程和结果,并识别未来需要解决的问题至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验