Vaidya S, Cooper T Y, Avandsalehi J, Barnes T, Brooks K, Hymel P, Noor M, Sellers R, Thomas A, Stewart D, Daller J, Fish J C, Gugliuzza K K, Bray R A
Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77555-0178, USA.
Transplantation. 2001 Feb 15;71(3):422-8. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200102150-00015.
Flow cytomeric crossmatch (FCXM) has grown in popularity and has become the "standard of practice" in many programs. Although FCXM is the most sensitive method for detecting alloantibody, the B cell FCXM has been problematic. Difficulties with the B cell FCXMs have been centered around high nonspecific fluorescence background owing to Fc-receptors present on the B cells and autoantibodies. To improve the specificity and sensitivity of the B cell FCXM, we utilized the proteolytic enzyme pronase to remove Fc receptors from lymphocytes before their use in FCXM.
Lymphocytes isolated from peripheral blood, spleen, or lymph nodes were treated with pronase and then used in a three-color FCXM. A total of 167 T- and B cell FCXMs using pronase-treated and untreated cells were performed. Testing used serial dilutions of HLA allosera (22 class I and 6 class II), with the titer of each antibody at one dilution past the titer at which the complement-mediated cytotoxicity anti-human globulin crossmatch became negative.
After pronase treatment, the actual channel values of the negative control in both T cell and B cell FCXMs declined from 78+/-10 to 57+/-4 (P<0.05) and 107+/-11 to 49+/-3 (P<0.00001), respectively. Pronase treatment resulted in improved sensitivity of the T and B cell FCXM in detecting class I antibody by 20% and 80%, respectively. In no instance was a false-positive reaction observed. In this study, pronase treatment improved the specificity of B cell FCXM for detecting class II antibodies from 75% to 100% (P=0.03). In no instance was a false-negative reaction recorded. Lastly, on the basis of these observations we re-evaluated three primary transplant recipients who lost their allografts because of accelerated rejection. One of the patients was transplanted across negative T and B cell FCXM, whereas the other two patients were transplanted across a positive T cell, but negative B cell, FCXM. After pronase treatment, T and B cell FCXMs of each patient became strongly positive, and donor-specific anti-HLA class I antibody was identi. fied in each case.
Utilization of pronase-treated lymphocytes improves both the sensitivity and specificity of the FCXM.
流式细胞仪交叉配型(FCXM)越来越受欢迎,已成为许多项目中的“实践标准”。尽管FCXM是检测同种抗体最敏感的方法,但B细胞FCXM一直存在问题。B细胞FCXM的困难主要集中在B细胞和自身抗体上存在的Fc受体导致的高非特异性荧光背景。为了提高B细胞FCXM的特异性和敏感性,我们在将淋巴细胞用于FCXM之前,利用蛋白酶去除淋巴细胞上的Fc受体。
从外周血、脾脏或淋巴结分离的淋巴细胞用蛋白酶处理,然后用于三色FCXM。共进行了167次使用蛋白酶处理和未处理细胞的T细胞和B细胞FCXM检测。检测使用HLA同种异体血清的系列稀释液(22种I类和6种II类),每种抗体的滴度比补体介导的细胞毒性抗人球蛋白交叉配型变为阴性时的滴度高一个稀释度。
蛋白酶处理后,T细胞和B细胞FCXM中阴性对照的实际通道值分别从78±10降至57±4(P<0.05)和107±11降至49±3(P<0.00001)。蛋白酶处理使T细胞和B细胞FCXM检测I类抗体的敏感性分别提高了20%和80%。未观察到假阳性反应。在本研究中,蛋白酶处理将B细胞FCXM检测II类抗体的特异性从75%提高到100%(P=0.03)。未记录到假阴性反应。最后,基于这些观察结果,我们重新评估了三名因加速排斥反应而失去同种异体移植物的原发性移植受者。其中一名患者的T细胞和B细胞FCXM均为阴性时进行了移植,而另外两名患者的T细胞FCXM为阳性但B细胞FCXM为阴性时进行了移植。蛋白酶处理后,每位患者的T细胞和B细胞FCXM均变为强阳性,且在每种情况下均鉴定出供体特异性抗HLA I类抗体。
使用蛋白酶处理的淋巴细胞可以提高FCXM的敏感性和特异性。