Watkins M J
Institute of Health Studies, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK.
J Clin Nurs. 2000 May;9(3):338-46. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2000.00402.x.
This article discusses the report of the United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting (UKCC) Commission that was published in 1999. Problems identified with the previous Project 2000 model of diploma-level nursing programmes are identified, including student criticisms of placement arrangements and the existence of both theory-practice and practice-theory gaps. The UKCC Commission's recommendations for curricular revision are discussed, particularly in relation to clinical competence and how this should be defined and measured. The implications for who should supervise and assess students in clinical practice are also explored. The importance of preparing and assessing students for holistic individualized care which respects patients' own beliefs, values and culture is emphasized.
本文讨论了英国护理、助产与健康访视中央委员会（UKCC）委员会于1999年发布的报告。报告指出了之前2000年项目模式下文凭水平护理课程存在的问题，包括学生对实习安排的批评以及理论与实践、实践与理论之间差距的存在。文中讨论了UKCC委员会对课程修订的建议，特别是与临床能力相关的建议，以及应如何界定和衡量临床能力。此外，还探讨了临床实践中应由谁监督和评估学生的问题。强调了培养和评估学生提供尊重患者自身信仰、价值观和文化的整体个性化护理的重要性。
