Little C V
Bournemouth House, Bournemouth University, 17 Christchurch Road, Bournemouth BH1 3LG, UK.
J Clin Nurs. 2000 May;9(3):391-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2000.00395.x.
Post-registration education programmes are frequently informed by nationally agreed curriculum frameworks. Although these aim to promote comparability between similarly focused clinical courses, inconsistencies have recently been identified across a range of critical care curricula. This suggests that broad-based frameworks may be insufficiently sensitive to local learning needs. This study was concerned with the extent to which the curriculum met the learning needs of 10 post-registration critical care students and, in particular, aimed to explore the meaning of learning to the students themselves. The study revealed technological competence to be a necessary foundation to the development of clinical practice and this is discussed from a philosophical perspective which allows the nature of contemporary nursing practice to be reconceptualized. It is argued that curriculum development for clinically based, post-registration courses can be constructively informed by local consultation and that phenomenological study can complement more traditional approaches often relied upon in educational research.
注册后教育项目通常依据国家商定的课程框架开展。尽管这些框架旨在促进重点相似的临床课程之间的可比性,但最近在一系列重症护理课程中发现了不一致之处。这表明基础广泛的框架可能对当地学习需求不够敏感。本研究关注该课程在多大程度上满足了10名注册后重症护理学生的学习需求,尤其旨在探究学习对学生自身的意义。研究表明技术能力是临床实践发展的必要基础,并从哲学角度对此进行了讨论,这使得当代护理实践的本质能够被重新认识。有人认为,基于临床的注册后课程的课程开发可以通过当地咨询得到建设性的指导,并且现象学研究可以补充教育研究中经常依赖的更传统的方法。