Rossi G P, Sacchetto A, Chiesura-Corona M, De Toni R, Gallina M, Feltrin G P, Pessina A C
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Padova, 35126 Padova, Italy.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Mar;86(3):1083-90. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.3.7287.
The objectives of this study were to investigate the usefulness of adrenal vein sampling in identifying the etiology of primary aldosteronism (PA) in patients with equivocal CT and MR findings. Between 1990 and 1999, 104 referred hypertensive patients (45 women and 59 men, aged 49.6 +/- 11.6 yr) were diagnosed to have PA with inconclusive computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance results, based on established criteria. Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) for measurement of plasma aldosterone (A) and cortisol (C) levels was performed in all. Selectivity of AVS was assessed by the ratio between C levels in each adrenal vein and in the infrarenal inferior vena cava plasma (C(side)/C(IVC)). A receiver operator characteristics analysis was carried out to establish 1) the best AVS-derived index, 2) the degree of selectivity that could provide an accurate diagnosis, and 3) whether a correct diagnosis could be made from a unilaterally selective AVS. An aldosterone-producing adenoma (average diameter, 12.2 +/- 0.08 mm) was eventually diagnosed in 41 patients (39.4%) and was excluded in the rest. Adrenal vein rupture leading to partial adrenal loss occurred in 1 patient (0.9% complication rate). By assuming a cut-off value of C(side)/C(IVC) > or = 1.1, AVS was selective in 85.7% and 94.1% of cases on the right and left sides, respectively, and bilaterally in 80.6% of cases. Of all AVS-derived indexes, the A/C of one over the A/C contralateral side [(A/C)(side)/(A/C)(contralateral side)] furnished the best diagnostic accuracy. With a bilaterally selective AVS, a value of (A/C)(side)/(A/C)(contralateral side) > or = 2 provided a conclusive etiological diagnosis of PA in 79.7% of cases. At variance, no accurate diagnosis could be made from unilaterally selective AVS. AVS was feasible and safe in most PA patients with inconclusive computed tomography and magnetic resonance scans. When bilaterally selective (i.e. C(side)/C(IVC) > or = 1.1) a ratio of (A/C)(side)/(A/C)(control) > or = 2 provided the best compromise of sensitivity and false positive rate for lateralization of the etiology of PA.
本研究的目的是探讨肾上腺静脉采血在CT和MR表现不明确的原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)患者中确定病因的作用。1990年至1999年间,104例转诊的高血压患者(45例女性和59例男性,年龄49.6±11.6岁)根据既定标准被诊断为PA,其计算机断层扫描和磁共振结果不明确。对所有患者均进行肾上腺静脉采血(AVS)以测量血浆醛固酮(A)和皮质醇(C)水平。通过每条肾上腺静脉与肾下腔静脉血浆中C水平的比值(C(侧)/C(IVC))评估AVS的选择性。进行了受试者操作特征分析,以确定1)最佳的AVS衍生指标;2)能够提供准确诊断的选择性程度;3)是否可以通过单侧选择性AVS做出正确诊断。最终41例患者(39.4%)被诊断为醛固酮瘤(平均直径12.2±0.08mm),其余患者被排除。1例患者发生肾上腺静脉破裂导致部分肾上腺丢失(并发症发生率0.9%)。假设C(侧)/C(IVC)≥1.1为临界值,AVS在右侧和左侧病例中的选择性分别为85.7%和94.1%,双侧选择性为80.6%。在所有AVS衍生指标中,一侧的A/C与对侧的A/C之比[(A/C)(侧)/(A/C)(对侧)]提供了最佳诊断准确性。对于双侧选择性AVS,(A/C)(侧)/(A/C)(对侧)≥2的值在79.7%的病例中提供了PA的确切病因诊断。相反,单侧选择性AVS无法做出准确诊断。对于大多数CT和磁共振扫描结果不明确的PA患者,AVS是可行且安全的。当双侧选择性(即C(侧)/C(IVC)≥1.1)时,(A/C)(侧)/(A/C)(对照)≥2的比值为PA病因的侧别诊断提供了最佳的敏感性和假阳性率折衷。