Suppr超能文献

转移性乳腺癌患者双高剂量与三高剂量化疗联合自体血干细胞移植的比较。

Comparison of double and triple high-dose chemotherapy with autologous blood stem cell transplantation in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

作者信息

Schneeweiss A, Hensel M, Goerner R, Khbeis T, Hohaus S, Egerer G, Solomayer E, Haas R, Grischke E M, Bastert G, Ho A D

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Stem Cells. 2001;19(2):151-60. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.19-2-151.

Abstract

In patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), early dose intensification with multiple cycles of peripheral blood stem cell-supported high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) seems superior to a late dose-intensification strategy. We compared the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 20 patients treated with a double (D)-HDCT regimen to 20 patients who received a triple (T)-HDCT, matched by age, estrogen receptor (ER) status, adjuvant chemotherapy, initial disease-free interval, predominant metastatic site, and number of metastatic sites. At a median follow-up of 41.5 months (range, 14-88 months) an intent-to-treat analysis showed no difference in PFS (p = 0.72) and OS (p = 0.93) between the matched patients. For all 76 patients treated within the D- or T-HDCT trial, median PFS and OS was 13 months (range, 2-78 months) and 24.5 months (range, 7-78 months), respectively. In multivariate analysis independent predictors of shorter OS included negative ER (relative risk [RR] = 3.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-5.9]; p = 0.002), more than two metastatic sites (RR = 2.4 [95% CI 1.0-5.7]; p = 0.049) and failure to achieve complete remission/no evidence of disease (CR/NED) after HDCT (RR = 4.5 [95% CI 2.0-10.1]; p < 0.0001). These data show that early dose intensification with T-HDCT is not superior to a D-HDCT regimen in patients with MBC. ER-negative tumors, more than two metastatic sites and no CR/NED after HDCT, are associated with inferior outcome.

摘要

在转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者中,采用多周期外周血干细胞支持的大剂量化疗(HDCT)进行早期剂量强化似乎优于晚期剂量强化策略。我们将20例接受双(D)-HDCT方案治疗的患者与20例接受三(T)-HDCT治疗的患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)进行了比较,这些患者在年龄、雌激素受体(ER)状态、辅助化疗、初始无病间期、主要转移部位和转移部位数量方面进行了匹配。在中位随访41.5个月(范围14 - 88个月)时,意向性分析显示匹配患者之间的PFS(p = 0.72)和OS(p = 0.93)没有差异。对于在D-或T-HDCT试验中接受治疗的所有76例患者,中位PFS和OS分别为13个月(范围2 - 78个月)和24.5个月(范围7 - 78个月)。在多变量分析中,较短OS的独立预测因素包括ER阴性(相对风险[RR] = 3.0 [95%置信区间(CI)1.5 - 5.9];p = 0.002)、两个以上转移部位(RR = 2.4 [95% CI 1.0 - 5.7];p = 0.049)以及HDCT后未实现完全缓解/无疾病证据(CR/NED)(RR = 4.5 [95% CI 2.0 - 10.1];p < 0.0001)。这些数据表明,在MBC患者中,采用T-HDCT进行早期剂量强化并不优于D-HDCT方案。ER阴性肿瘤、两个以上转移部位以及HDCT后未达到CR/NED与较差的预后相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验