[Dual x-ray absorptiometry assessment of bone density of the proximal tibia in advanced-stage degenerative disease of the knee].

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

Axial deformity secondary to degenerative joint disease of the knee can modify stress forces. Certain studies have reported an inversely proportional relationship between degenerative disease and osteoporosis. The aim of this prospective study was to quantify the horizontal linear distribution of bone density using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the proximal tibia as a function of the femoral neck bone density in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between September 1996 and March 1998, 90 cases of primary degenerative joint disease of the knee were programmed for total knee arthroplasty. Prior to the procedure, the patients were assessed clinically and radiologically according to the International Knee Society (IKS) criteria. The mechanical femorotibial angle was measured in all patients and the varus angles were recorded. Most of the patients were women (65 p. 100) with a mean age of 70 +/- 5 years. Valgus knees were excluded from this series. The mean mechanical femorotibial angle was 172 +/- 5 degrees. Fifteen patients had a normal axis (16 p. 100), 32 had a varus measuring 4 degrees to 10 degrees (35 p. 100) and 43 had a varus measuring 10 degrees or more (48 p. 100). The overall varus distance was 6.4 +/- 2 cm. All patients had two DXA explorations: femoral neck to determine the bone status according to the WHO criteria (normal, osteopenia, osteoporosis), knee to determine the linear distribution of bone density of the proximal tibia. A 7 mm high band including 7 regions of interest covering the width of the tibia were explored in the area where the tibial cut was to be made. These 7 regions of interest were: R1, R2 under the lateral compartment, R6, R7 under the medial compartment, and R3, R4, R5 on either side of the tibial spines. The level of significance was set at 5 p. 100.

RESULTS

The mean Z score (0.54 +/- 1) in the 90 patients showed a symmetrical distribution. These patients were representative of their age range. Their T score was - 1.40 +/- 1 (m +/- SD) and most had osteopenia (54 p. 100) according to the WHO criteria, although 16 p. 100 had osteoporosis. Mean bone density of the knee was 0.898 +/- 0.163 g/cm(3) and was correlated with that of the femoral neck (r=0.61, p=0.001). There were significant correlations between the differences in the bone densities of the knee compartments (R6-R2, R7-R1) and the mechanical femorotibial angle [(r=0.39, p=0.0001); (r=0.52, p=0.001)]. Irrespective of the overall bone density, there was a strong medial compartment overloading, which correlated with the degree of varus deformation.

CONCLUSION

DXA assessment of bone mineral density of the proximal tibia is a simple, reliable, precise and reproducible method. The distribution of bone density in the degenerative knee depends on the degree of deformation. The average level depends on the subject's general state of mineralization. Osteoporosis does not protect against degeneration of the knee joint since 16 p. 100 of our patients had osteoporosis according to the WHO criteria.