Holden J D
Medical Centre, Haydock, St Helens, Lancs, UK.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2001 Feb;7(1):65-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00280.x.
The Hawthorne studies in the 1930s demonstrated how difficult it is to understand workplace behaviour, and this includes professional performance. Studies of interventions to improve professional performance, such as audit, can provide useful information for those considering using such methods, but cannot replace judgement. In particular, there is no single phenomenon that can be labelled 'the Hawthorne effect'. The process of triangulation, considering a subject from different perspectives, might overcome the problems of Hawthorne effects better than using a single method such as controlled trials.
20世纪30年代的霍桑研究表明,理解职场行为是多么困难,这其中包括专业表现。对诸如审计等旨在提高专业表现的干预措施的研究,可以为那些考虑使用此类方法的人提供有用信息,但无法取代判断。特别是,不存在单一的现象可以被称为“霍桑效应”。从不同角度考虑一个主题的三角测量法,可能比使用单一方法(如对照试验)能更好地克服霍桑效应带来的问题。