Hawks J, Wolpoff M H
Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84112, USA.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2001 Mar;114(3):269-72. doi: 10.1002/1096-8644(200103)114:3<269::AID-AJPA1025>3.0.CO;2-R.
The Mezmaiskaya cave mtDNA is similar in many ways to the Feldhofer cave Neandertal sequence and the more recently obtained Vindija cave sequence. If we accept the contention that the Mezmaiskaya cave specimen is a Neandertal infant, its mtDNA provides no new information about the fate of the European Neandertals. However, there is reason to believe that the Mezmaiskaya cave infant is not a Neandertal, and this places its importance in another light, because it delimits the possible hypotheses of Neandertal and recent human genetic relationships. One possibility is a that the pattern found in ancient mtDNA results from the replacement of an isolated gene pool (Neandertals) by one of its contemporaries (modern humans). A second possibility is natural selection expressed as the substitution of an advantageous mtDNA variant within a single large species, including both Neandertals and modern humans. The geologic, archaeological, and dating evidence shows the Mezmaiskaya cave infant to be a burial from a level even more recent than the Upper Paleolithic preserved at the site, and its anatomy does not contradict the assessment that the Mezmaiskaya cave infant is not a Neandertal. Therefore, the second pattern can be favored over the first.
梅兹迈斯卡亚洞穴的线粒体DNA(mtDNA)在许多方面与费尔德霍费尔洞穴的尼安德特人序列以及最近获得的温迪加洞穴序列相似。如果我们认同梅兹迈斯卡亚洞穴的标本是一个尼安德特人婴儿这一观点,那么其mtDNA并未提供有关欧洲尼安德特人命运的新信息。然而,有理由相信梅兹迈斯卡亚洞穴的婴儿并非尼安德特人,这使其重要性呈现出另一种面貌,因为它限定了尼安德特人与现代人类基因关系的可能假设。一种可能性是,古代mtDNA中发现的模式是由一个孤立的基因库(尼安德特人)被其同代人之一(现代人类)所取代导致的。第二种可能性是自然选择,表现为在一个单一的大型物种(包括尼安德特人和现代人类)中,一种有利的mtDNA变体的替代。地质、考古和年代测定证据表明,梅兹迈斯卡亚洞穴的婴儿是来自比该遗址保存的旧石器时代晚期更晚地层的墓葬,并且其解剖结构并不与梅兹迈斯卡亚洞穴的婴儿不是尼安德特人的评估相矛盾。因此,第二种模式比第一种更可取。