Suppr超能文献

韩国人群中的新ADA标准:仅空腹血糖不足以诊断轻度糖尿病,尤其是在老年人中。

New ADA criteria in the Korean population: fasting blood glucose is not enough for diagnosis of mild diabetes especially in the elderly.

作者信息

Choi Y H, Ahn Y B, Yoon K H, Kang M I, Cha B Y, Lee K W, Son H Y, Kang S K

机构信息

Endocrinology Section, Catholic Research Institute of Medical Science, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Intern Med. 2000 Dec;15(3):211-7. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2000.15.3.211.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare the 1997 American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria with the 1985 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria in categorization of the diabetes diagnostic status of Koreans and to define clinical characteristics of subjects diagnosed differently by the two criteria.

METHODS

In 810 Korean subjects, we analyzed blood glucose and insulin response during 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). According to current WHO criteria, the cutoff values of FPG which distinguish normal and IGT from diabetes were determined. Then the subjects were categorized according to both WHO and ADA criteria. The clinical characteristics of the subjects with different diagnostic categories by the two criteria were defined.

RESULTS

The FPG cut point distinguishing diabetes from IGT was 117 mg/dl, and from normal was 110 mg/dl. The overall agreement between the ADA criteria and the WHO criteria was moderate, as reflected in the kappa of 0.45. 141 of subjects categorized diabetes by WHO criteria were not diagnosed with ADA criteria. These discordant subjects were older in age and showed blunted early insulin response than concordant normal subjects.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that mild diabetes by the WHO criteria, especially in the elderly, would not be diagnosed as diabetes by the ADA FPG criteria only. Thus, in a group at high risk for developing diabetes or in a relatively older age group, we should continue using the OGTT.

摘要

背景

比较1997年美国糖尿病协会(ADA)标准与1985年世界卫生组织(WHO)标准对韩国人糖尿病诊断状态的分类,并明确两种标准诊断不同的受试者的临床特征。

方法

对810名韩国受试者进行75克口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT),分析其血糖和胰岛素反应。根据现行WHO标准,确定区分正常、糖耐量受损(IGT)与糖尿病的空腹血糖(FPG)临界值。然后根据WHO和ADA标准对受试者进行分类。明确两种标准诊断类别不同的受试者的临床特征。

结果

区分糖尿病与IGT的FPG切点为117毫克/分升,区分糖尿病与正常的FPG切点为110毫克/分升。ADA标准与WHO标准的总体一致性为中等,kappa值为0.45。141名根据WHO标准分类为糖尿病的受试者未被ADA标准诊断为糖尿病。这些诊断不一致的受试者年龄较大,早期胰岛素反应较迟钝,而诊断一致的正常受试者则不然。

结论

这些结果表明,WHO标准下的轻度糖尿病,尤其是老年人中的轻度糖尿病,仅根据ADA的FPG标准不会被诊断为糖尿病。因此,在糖尿病高危人群或相对老年人群中,应继续采用OGTT。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6669/4531770/ff494f73f46b/kjim-15-3-211-7f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验