Bradway D S, Torioni de Echaide S, Knowles D P, Hennager S G, McElwain T F
Washington Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Pullman 99164, USA.
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2001 Jan;13(1):79-81. doi: 10.1177/104063870101300117.
The complement fixation (CF) test commonly is used to identify cattle infected with Anaplasma marginale prior to interstate or international movement. Estimates of the accuracy of the CF test in detecting animals persistently infected with A. marginale vary widely. In this study, the sensitivity and specificity of the CF test for detection of carrier animals was determined using serum from 232 cattle previously defined as A. marginale positive or negative by nested polymerase chain reaction methods and hybridization. Considering results from 2 independent laboratories and interpreting a 1:5 suspect reaction as positive, the best estimate of CF test sensitivity was 20%, with a specificity of 98%. Using a 1:10 cutoff, sensitivity decreased to 14% and specificity increased to 99%. Results of this study indicate that the CF test is ineffective for identifying cattle persistently infected with A. marginale and thus is inadequate for anaplasmosis regulatory and surveillance programs.
补体结合(CF)试验通常用于在牛进行州际或国际运输前,识别感染边缘无浆体的牛。CF试验在检测持续感染边缘无浆体动物方面的准确性估计差异很大。在本研究中,使用先前通过巢式聚合酶链反应方法和杂交被定义为边缘无浆体阳性或阴性的232头牛的血清,确定CF试验检测携带动物的敏感性和特异性。考虑到2个独立实验室的结果,并将1:5的可疑反应解释为阳性,CF试验敏感性的最佳估计值为20%,特异性为98%。使用1:10的临界值,敏感性降至14%,特异性升至99%。本研究结果表明,CF试验在识别持续感染边缘无浆体的牛方面无效,因此不足以用于无浆体病监管和监测计划。