Suppr超能文献

捏力评分的仪器间可靠性。

Inter-instrument reliability of pinch strength scores.

作者信息

MacDermid J C, Evenhuis W, Louzon M

机构信息

Clinical Research Laboratory, Hand and Upper Limb Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Hand Ther. 2001 Jan-Mar;14(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/s0894-1130(01)80023-5.

Abstract

The consistency of pinch scores obtained with new devices compared with that of scores obtained by traditional devices underlies the ability of therapists to use new devices when communicating about patient status or using normative data published for these traditional devices. This study determined the inter-instrument reliability of pinch strength scores obtained using three commercially available pinch gauges (B&L, JTech and NK pinch gauges). Volunteers (average age, 32 years; range, 18 to 80 years; 19 women, 21 men; 20 with hand pathology, 20 without hand pathology) were tested on a single occasion using all three devices. Each subject was tested with the elbow at 90%, the forearm neutral, and the wrist in neutral deviation. Three trials of maximum tripod and key pinch strength were performed. The hand tested first and the instrument order were randomized. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The inter-instrument error and its associated boundaries (+/- 2 SD) were also calculated. Intraclass correlation coefficients were high for both affected and unaffected hands in patients (> 0.90) and in subjects without pathology (> 0.80). Average instrument error was close to zero and was similar between instruments, indicating a lack of instrument bias. These results suggest that pinch strength scores obtained with any of these three pinch gauges can be compared with normative data obtained with either of the other pinch gauges.

摘要

与传统设备所获分数相比,新设备所获捏力分数的一致性是治疗师在交流患者状况或使用针对这些传统设备发布的标准数据时使用新设备的能力基础。本研究确定了使用三种市售捏力计(B&L、JTech和NK捏力计)所获捏力强度分数的仪器间可靠性。志愿者(平均年龄32岁;范围18至80岁;19名女性,21名男性;20名有手部病变,20名无手部病变)在单次测试中使用所有三种设备进行测试。每个受试者在肘部呈90°、前臂中立且手腕无偏斜的情况下接受测试。进行三次最大三指捏和钥匙捏力的试验。首先测试的手和仪器顺序是随机的。计算组内相关系数(ICC)及其95%置信区间。还计算了仪器间误差及其相关界限(±2标准差)。患者中患侧和未患侧手的组内相关系数均较高(>0.90),无病变受试者的组内相关系数也较高(>0.80)。平均仪器误差接近零,且各仪器之间相似,表明不存在仪器偏差。这些结果表明,使用这三种捏力计中的任何一种所获捏力强度分数都可以与使用其他任何一种捏力计所获标准数据进行比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验