Suppr超能文献

Baseline® 5 位液压捏力计的常模数据以及侧捏力与捏距之间的关系。

Normative data for the Baseline® 5 position hydraulic pinch meter and the relationship between lateral pinch strength and pinch span.

机构信息

Western Michigan University, Department of Occupational Therapy, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.

Western Michigan University, Department of Occupational Therapy, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Hand Ther. 2021 Jul-Sep;34(3):453-462. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2020.03.007. Epub 2020 Jul 5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Baseline® 5 position hydraulic pinch meter allows pinch strength assessment at five different pinch spans. The present study used this newly developed meter to assess where pinch span force is the greatest as previous literature is conflicting.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The primary aim of the study was development of normative data using health subjects, whereas the secondary aims were to evaluate meter inter-rater reliability and to identify in which pinch span the greatest force was produced.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a clinical measurement, cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Ten occupational therapy student raters examined inter-rater reliability by calculating an average intraclass correlation. Recruitment of normative data subjects occurred across various locations in West Michigan to include a diverse population and followed testing procedures recommended by the American Society of Hand Therapists. Data were stratified by age categories and sex to develop normative standards. Data were analyzed using a one-way repeated measures ANOVA and a three-way mixed ANOVA.

RESULTS

Normative data were calculated from a sample of 605 subjects (292 males and 313 females). One-way ANOVA demonstrated a significant difference at the five different spans, noting a small effect size. Also noted were a nonsignificant three-way interaction between age category, pinch spans, and sex using both the right and left hands, along with a significant two-way interaction between spans and sex bilaterally.

DISCUSSION

The meter showed an excellent inter-rater reliability with an intraclass correlation = .98 and indicated the pinch span that produced the greatest amount of force was not consistent with previous literature.

摘要

简介

Baseline® 5 位置液压捏力计可在五个不同的捏合跨度下评估捏合力。本研究使用新开发的量表来评估捏合跨度力最大的位置,因为之前的文献存在矛盾。

研究目的

本研究的主要目的是使用健康受试者制定正常参考值,次要目的是评估量表的评分者间信度,并确定在哪个捏合跨度产生的力最大。

研究设计

这是一项临床测量、横断面研究。

方法

10 名职业治疗学生评估者通过计算组内相关系数来评估评分者间信度。正常参考值受试者的招募在密歇根州西部的不同地点进行,以纳入不同的人群,并遵循美国手治疗师协会推荐的测试程序。数据按年龄类别和性别分层,以制定正常标准。使用单向重复测量方差分析和三向混合方差分析进行数据分析。

结果

从 605 名受试者(292 名男性和 313 名女性)中计算出正常参考值数据。单因素方差分析显示,五个不同的跨度存在显著差异,提示效应量较小。还注意到,在使用右手和左手时,年龄类别、捏合跨度和性别之间的三向交互作用无统计学意义,双侧跨度和性别之间存在显著的双向交互作用。

讨论

该量表显示出极好的评分者间信度,组内相关系数为.98,表明产生最大力量的捏合跨度与之前的文献不一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验