Roebers C M, Moga N, Schneider W
University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2001 Apr;78(4):313-29. doi: 10.1006/jecp.2000.2577.
To examine the role of accuracy motivation in event recall, 6-, 7-, and 8-year-old children and adults were shown a short video about a conflict between two groups of children. Three weeks later, participants were asked a set of unbiased specific questions about the video. Following A. Koriat and M. Goldsmith's (1994) distinction of quantity- and quality-oriented memory assessments, and based on their model of strategic regulation of memory accuracy (1996), accuracy motivation was manipulated across three conditions. Participants were (a) forced to provide an answer to each question (low accuracy motivation), (b) initially instructed to withhold uncertain answers by saying "I don't know" (medium accuracy motivation), or (c) rewarded for every single correct answer (high accuracy motivation). When motivation for accuracy was high, children as young as 6 were to withhold uncertain answers to the benefit of accuracy. The expected quality-quantity trade-off emerged only for peripheral items but not for the central items. Participants who were forced to provide an answer gave more correct answers but also high numbers of incorrect answers than participants who had the option to answer "I don't know." The results are discussed in terms of the underlying model as well as in terms of forensic interviewing.
为了研究准确性动机在事件回忆中的作用,向6岁、7岁、8岁儿童及成年人展示了一段关于两组儿童冲突的短视频。三周后,向参与者询问了一系列关于该视频的无偏见具体问题。遵循A.科里亚和M.戈德史密斯(1994年)对数量导向和质量导向记忆评估的区分,并基于他们的记忆准确性策略调节模型(1996年),在三种条件下对准确性动机进行了操控。参与者被要求:(a)必须回答每个问题(低准确性动机);(b)最初被指示通过说“我不知道”来保留不确定答案(中等准确性动机);或(c)每答对一个答案可获得奖励(高准确性动机)。当准确性动机较高时,年仅6岁的儿童会为了提高准确性而保留不确定答案。预期的质量-数量权衡仅在周边项目中出现,而在核心项目中未出现。被迫回答问题的参与者比可以选择回答“我不知道”的参与者给出了更多正确答案,但错误答案的数量也更多。将根据基础模型以及法医询问对结果进行讨论。