Gazzinelli A, Bethony J, Fraga L A, LoVerde P T, Correa-Oliveira R, Kloos H
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Trop Med Int Health. 2001 Feb;6(2):126-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2001.00684.x.
The study of water contact patterns in rural Brazil presents unique challenges due to widely dispersed settlement patterns, the ubiquity of water contact sites, and the privatization of water resources. This study addresses these challenges by comparing the two most widely used methods of assessing water contact behaviour: direct observation and survey. The results of a 7-day direct observation of water contact were compared with water contact surveys administered 1 week after and then 1 year after the direct observation study. The direct observation study recorded a water contact rate higher than reported by other investigators (3.2 contacts per person per day); however, 75% of these contacts were for females and consisted mainly of domestic activities occurring around the household. A comparison of the frequency of water contact activities between the direct observation and the two surveys revealed several important points. First, no significant differences were found between methods for routine water contact activities (e.g. bathing), indicating that participants were able to accurately self-report some types of water contact activities. Second, significant differences were found in the recording of water contact activities that took place outside the observation area, indicating that direct observation may under-report water contact activities in areas where contact sites are dispersed widely. Third, significant differences between the direct observation and the survey method were more common for males than for females, indicating that the combination of widespread water contact sites and gender-specific division of labour may result in under-reporting of male contacts by direct observation methods. In short, despite the limitations in the recording of duration and body exposure, the survey method may more accurately record the frequency of water contact activities than direct observation methods in areas of widely dispersed water contact sites. Hence, surveys may be more suitable for the unique challenges of water contact in rural areas of Brazil.
由于巴西农村居民点分布广泛、水接触场所无处不在以及水资源私有化,对巴西农村水接触模式的研究面临着独特的挑战。本研究通过比较两种最广泛使用的评估水接触行为的方法来应对这些挑战:直接观察法和调查法。将为期7天的水接触直接观察结果与在直接观察研究1周后及1年后进行的水接触调查结果进行了比较。直接观察研究记录的水接触率高于其他研究者报告的水平(每人每天3.2次接触);然而,这些接触中有75%是女性的,且主要是围绕家庭进行的家务活动。对直接观察法与两项调查中水接触活动频率的比较揭示了几个要点。第一,在日常水接触活动(如洗澡)的方法之间未发现显著差异,这表明参与者能够准确地自我报告某些类型的水接触活动。第二,在观察区域外发生的水接触活动记录方面发现了显著差异,这表明在接触场所广泛分散的地区,直接观察法可能会少报水接触活动。第三,直接观察法与调查法之间的显著差异在男性中比在女性中更为常见,这表明广泛分布的水接触场所与特定性别的劳动分工相结合,可能导致直接观察法少报男性的接触情况。简而言之,尽管在记录持续时间和身体暴露方面存在局限性,但在水接触场所广泛分散的地区,调查法可能比直接观察法更准确地记录水接触活动的频率。因此,调查可能更适合应对巴西农村地区水接触的独特挑战。