Suppr超能文献

单药达卡巴嗪与联合化疗(联合或不联合免疫治疗)用于转移性黑色素瘤的疗效比较:对来自20项随机试验的3273例患者的荟萃分析

Single-agent DTIC versus combination chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma: a meta-analysis of 3273 patients from 20 randomized trials.

作者信息

Huncharek M, Caubet J F, McGarry R

机构信息

Division of Radiation Oncology, Marshfield Clinic Cancer Center, St Michael's Hospital, Steven's Point, WI 54481, USA.

出版信息

Melanoma Res. 2001 Feb;11(1):75-81. doi: 10.1097/00008390-200102000-00009.

Abstract

It is currently unclear whether any combination therapy for the treatment of metastatic melanoma is superior to standard single-agent dacarbazine (DTIC) in terms of tumour response and overall survival. The available randomized clinical trial data were combined in a meta-analysis to address this question. Initially a thorough MEDLARS search was conducted covering the time period from January 1970 to January 1999. This literature search was supplemented by manual searches of study bibliographies (including review articles) and review of relevant textbooks. The meta-analysis was performed according to a prospective protocol using strict study eligibility criteria. Data derived from randomized controlled trials comparing single-agent DTIC with combination chemo/immunotherapy were combined using a fixed effects model. Data were stratified into three combination therapy groups: DTIC-containing regimens, non-DTIC-containing therapy, and chemotherapy plus immunotherapy. The primary outcome of interest was the proportion of patients demonstrating a complete or partial response to treatment. A total of 20 randomized trials comprising 3273 patients were initially combined in a meta-analysis. This yielded an odds ratio (OR) of 1.23 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.48), demonstrating that combination drug therapies are associated with a 23% increase in response rate compared with single-agent DTIC. The combination of DTIC plus interferon-alpha produced a tumour response rate 53% greater (95% CI 1.10-2.13) than that seen with DTIC alone. This increase was greater than that seen with DTIC-containing multi-drug regimens, which had an OR of 1.33 (95% CI 0.99-1.78). No difference in overall survival was demonstrated. Non-DTIC-containing treatment programmes showed no advantage over DTIC in terms of tumour response rate (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.45-1.32). The combination of DTIC and interferon-alpha appears more active than standard single-agent DTIC in metastatic melanoma. Further randomized clinical trials employing a DTIC plus interferon arm are necessary to confirm these results.

摘要

目前尚不清楚在肿瘤反应和总生存期方面,任何用于治疗转移性黑色素瘤的联合疗法是否优于标准单药达卡巴嗪(DTIC)。将现有的随机临床试验数据进行荟萃分析以解决这个问题。最初,对1970年1月至1999年1月期间进行了全面的医学文献分析与检索系统(MEDLARS)检索。通过人工检索研究文献目录(包括综述文章)和查阅相关教科书对该文献检索进行补充。根据前瞻性方案并使用严格的研究纳入标准进行荟萃分析。将比较单药DTIC与联合化疗/免疫疗法的随机对照试验得出的数据使用固定效应模型进行合并。数据被分层到三个联合治疗组:含DTIC的方案、不含DTIC的治疗以及化疗加免疫疗法。感兴趣的主要结局是对治疗表现出完全或部分反应的患者比例。最初共有20项包含3273例患者的随机试验被纳入荟萃分析。这得出优势比(OR)为1.23(95%置信区间[CI] 1.02 - 1.48),表明联合药物疗法与单药DTIC相比,反应率增加了23%。DTIC加α干扰素的联合治疗产生的肿瘤反应率比单独使用DTIC时高53%(95% CI 1.10 - 2.13)。这种增加大于含DTIC的多药方案所观察到的增加,后者的OR为1.33(95% CI 0.99 - 1.78)。在总生存期方面未显示出差异。不含DTIC的治疗方案在肿瘤反应率方面相对于DTIC没有优势(OR = 0.77,95% CI 0.45 - 1.32)。DTIC与α干扰素的联合在转移性黑色素瘤中似乎比标准单药DTIC更具活性。需要进一步进行采用DTIC加干扰素组的随机临床试验来证实这些结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验