Lin R Y, Nahal A, Lee M, Menikoff H
Department of Medicine, Saint Vincents Hospital & Medical Center of New York, New York Medical College, 10011, USA.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001 Feb;86(2):226-31. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62696-8.
We had previously used curette-probe (Rhinoprobe; Arlington Scientific, Springville, UT) to study nasal cytology in various types of patients. Because of the potential sampling ease of using a brush, we sought to compare cytological results obtained with a curette-probe with those obtained using a cytology brush (Cytobrush Plus; Medscand, Malmö, Sweden).
To compare the ability of samples of nasal leukocytes obtained with a curette-probe versus a cytology brush to distinguish clinical categories of patients attending an allergy clinic.
Adult allergy clinic patients were studied by both curette-probe and cytology brush sampling. Quantitation of eosinophils and total leukocytes was performed on samples. Comparisons of cell quantities for each sampling method were made in patients classified into clinical groups. Patients with rhinitis complaints and abnormalities of nasal mucosal appearance with or without aeroallergy were compared with other patients. The adjustment of leukocyte quantities for the numbers of epithelial cells observed was also analyzed. Sampling methods were also compared for receiver operating characteristics.
Curette-probe sample leukocyte quantities distinguished patients with symptoms of rhinitis (SR) with abnormal nasal appearance from other patients. This between-group distinction was more significant for leukocyte numbers normalized for the number of epithelial cells. SR patients with both abnormal nasal appearance and aeroallergy had significantly more eosinophils and less goblet cells than other patients. Greater than five curette-probe eosinophils were only observed in patients with SR. Brush samples did not show differences between patients stratified in these ways, and eosinophils were observed in patients without SR. Receiver operating characteristics favored curette-probe samples in terms of leukocyte or eosinophil increases characterizing their respective symptomatic patient subgroups.
Curette-probe-obtained nasal samples allow for leukocyte and eosinophil quantitations which characterize rhinitis patients better than brush-obtained samples. Total leukocyte quantitations obtained by curette-probe may represent a marker of inflammatory nasal disease in adults undergoing allergy evaluation and treatment for rhinitis.
我们之前使用刮匙-探针(鼻探针;阿灵顿科学公司,犹他州斯普林维尔)研究各类患者的鼻腔细胞学。由于使用刷子采样可能更容易,我们试图比较用刮匙-探针获得的细胞学结果与使用细胞学刷子(Cytobrush Plus;Medscand,瑞典马尔默)获得的结果。
比较用刮匙-探针与细胞学刷子获取的鼻腔白细胞样本区分过敏门诊患者临床类别的能力。
对成年过敏门诊患者同时采用刮匙-探针和细胞学刷子采样进行研究。对样本中的嗜酸性粒细胞和总白细胞进行定量分析。在分为临床组的患者中比较每种采样方法的细胞数量。将有鼻炎症状且鼻黏膜外观异常(无论有无气源性过敏)的患者与其他患者进行比较。还分析了根据观察到的上皮细胞数量对白细胞数量进行的调整。还比较了两种采样方法的受试者操作特征。
刮匙-探针样本的白细胞数量能区分出有鼻炎症状(SR)且鼻外观异常的患者与其他患者。对于根据上皮细胞数量进行标准化的白细胞数量,组间差异更为显著。鼻外观异常且有气源性过敏的SR患者比其他患者有更多的嗜酸性粒细胞和更少的杯状细胞。仅在SR患者中观察到刮匙-探针嗜酸性粒细胞大于五个。刷子样本在以这些方式分层的患者之间未显示出差异,且在无SR的患者中也观察到了嗜酸性粒细胞。在表征各自有症状患者亚组的白细胞或嗜酸性粒细胞增加方面,受试者操作特征显示刮匙-探针样本更具优势。
通过刮匙-探针获得的鼻腔样本进行白细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞定量分析,比通过刷子获得的样本能更好地表征鼻炎患者。刮匙-探针获得的总白细胞定量分析可能代表正在接受鼻炎过敏评估和治疗的成年人炎症性鼻病的一个标志物。