• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Quantitative level of protection offered to workers by ACGIH threshold limit values occupational exposure limits.

作者信息

Jayjock M A, Lewis P G, Lynch J R

机构信息

Rohm and Haas Co., Spring House, PA, USA.

出版信息

AIHAJ. 2001 Jan-Feb;62(1):4-11.

PMID:11258867
Abstract

The details of the example or modeling methodologies used herein are not critical to the general point of this article, which advises the estimation of residual risk at the OEL by using some quantitative modeling structure. Specifically, the authors believe that an explicit attempt to gauge the level of residual risk at the OEL based on conceptual stochastic models with transparent and testable assumptions could be seen as an important enhancement to the process. This is especially true in sharing the OEL deliberations and explaining OEL decisions to the stakeholders. Indeed, if this approach is used, it is critically important to understand and continually communicate that this "cloud of uncertainty" represents model estimates in which the true risk would most likely be less than worst case estimates and could possibly be zero. It is also possible but highly unlikely that it could be higher than the worst case upper-bound estimate. The above quantitative estimation scheme represents a possible improvement that could provide a reasoned attempt on the part of the risk assessors to use rational science (i.e., conceptual models with transparent and testable assumptions) to inform all of the OEL users and stakeholders of their meaning.

摘要

相似文献

1
Quantitative level of protection offered to workers by ACGIH threshold limit values occupational exposure limits.
AIHAJ. 2001 Jan-Feb;62(1):4-11.
2
Metalworking fluid mist occupational exposure limits: a discussion of alternative methods.金属加工液雾的职业接触限值:替代方法探讨
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2006 Sep;3(9):501-7. doi: 10.1080/15459620600867872.
3
Misinterpretation and misuse of exposure limits.暴露限值的误解与误用。
Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2001 Feb;16(2):251-6. doi: 10.1080/10473220118280.
4
Development of an occupational exposure limit for n-propylbromide using benchmark dose methods.使用基准剂量法制定正丙基溴的职业接触限值。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2004 Oct;40(2):136-50. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.06.006.
5
Benzene exposure in the shoemaking industry in China, a literature survey, 1978-2004.中国制鞋业苯暴露情况的文献调查(1978 - 2004年)
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006 Nov;46(2):149-56. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.06.009. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
6
Background, approaches and recent trends for setting health-based occupational exposure limits: a minireview.基于健康的职业接触限值设定的背景、方法及近期趋势:一篇综述
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Aug;51(3):253-69. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.04.002. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
7
Derivation of an occupational exposure limit for inorganic borates using a weight of evidence approach.采用证据权重法推导无机硼酸盐的职业接触限值。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;68(3):424-37. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
8
Evaluation of concentration-response options for diacetyl in support of occupational risk assessment.支持职业风险评估的双乙酰浓度反应选择评估。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010 Nov;58(2):285-96. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.06.011. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
9
Equipment, exposure, emission review--specification of process equipment for worker exposure control.设备、暴露、排放审查——用于控制工人暴露的工艺设备规范
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2008 Dec;5(12):797-806. doi: 10.1080/15459620802506088.
10
[Can exposure to low doses have effects?].[低剂量暴露会产生影响吗?]
G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2003 Jul-Sep;25(3):310-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Exposure Estimation and Interpretation of Occupational Risk: Enhanced Information for the Occupational Risk Manager.职业风险的暴露评估与解读:为职业风险管理者提供的强化信息。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12 Suppl 1(sup1):S99-111. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1084421.
2
Human health risk assessment related to contaminated land: state of the art.与污染土地相关的人类健康风险评估:现状
Environ Geochem Health. 2015 Aug;37(4):651-73. doi: 10.1007/s10653-015-9693-0. Epub 2015 Mar 26.