Nicardipine versus nitroprusside for breakthrough hypertension following carotid endarterectomy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of nicardipine and nitroprusside for breakthrough hypertension following carotid endarterectomy.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled effectiveness trial.

SETTING

University-based surgical intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

60 ASA physical status I, II, III, and IV patients experiencing breakthrough hypertension at the time of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received either nicardipine (n = 29) and placebo or nitroprusside (n = 31) and placebo for up to 6 hours postoperatively. Loading doses of nicardipine were provided, but placebo was used as a load for patients randomized to nitroprusside.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Rapidity and variability of blood pressure (BP) control were assessed. During the first 10 minutes, 83% of nicardipine patients compared to 23% of nitroprusside-treated patients, achieved BP control (p < 0.01). Following initial control, 12 nicardipine- and 24 nitroprusside-treated patients required additional titration of their infusions to maintain blood pressure within the targeted range (p < 0.05). No patient suffered a stroke, myocardial infarction, or was returned to the operating room (OR) for bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Nicardipine administration produced more rapid BP control, most likely related to the administration of a loading dose. In addition to more rapid control, nicardipine-treated patients had less variability in BP and required significantly fewer additional interventions. Although no patient suffered a major event during this study, this study was not powered sufficiently to assess safety.