Hasebe S, Graf E W, Schor C M
360 Minor Hall, School of Optometry, Vision Science Group, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-2020, USA.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2001 Mar;21(2):151-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2001.00558.x.
Ocular accommodation adopts a mean baseline response level of approximately 1.0 D in the absence of blur feedback (open-loop state). This baseline or tonic accommodation (TA) can be elevated following a sustained monocular accommodative response to a dioptric stimulus (lens adaptation) that exceeds the baseline open-loop level of TA. The accommodative response to the lens persists in the open-loop state (accommodative hysteresis), and eventually decays to a stable end-point. Interestingly, if the baseline TA is high, the monocularly adapted accommodative state can decay to an end-point that is below the initial pre-adapted baseline level of the TA (counter-adaptive response) (McBrien, N.A. and Millodot, M., (1988). Differences in adaptation of TA with refractive state. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 29, 460-469). We have investigated the possible contribution of accommodation fatigue to the counter-adaptive change in baseline TA following sustained accommodation. Two fatigue procedures were used while viewing a target at 66 or 33 cm. In a monocular condition, accommodation was stimulated for 3 min with lens values alternating from -1.5 to +1.5 D at a rate of 0.25 Hz. In the binocular condition, convergence was stimulated with alternating prism values from 9 prism diopters (PD) base-out to 9 PD base-in. Both monocular and binocular tasks resulted in a significant reduction of TA. These results suggest that previously reported reductions of baseline TA following sustained monocular accommodation or binocular convergence could have resulted from fatigue of the accommodative system. Accommodative fatigue could be responsible for the lower values of TA observed in counter-adaptive responses to sustained accommodative or convergence effort.
在没有模糊反馈的情况下(开环状态),眼的调节采用约1.0 D的平均基线反应水平。这种基线或紧张性调节(TA)在对屈光刺激(晶状体适应)的持续单眼调节反应超过TA的基线开环水平后会升高。对晶状体的调节反应在开环状态下持续存在(调节滞后),并最终衰减至稳定的终点。有趣的是,如果基线TA较高,单眼适应的调节状态可能会衰减至低于TA初始预适应基线水平的终点(反适应反应)(McBrien, N.A.和Millodot, M., (1988). TA适应与屈光状态的差异。Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 29, 460 - 469)。我们研究了调节疲劳对持续调节后基线TA反适应变化的可能作用。在观察66或33 cm处的目标时使用了两种疲劳程序。在单眼条件下,以0.25 Hz的频率用从 -1.5到 +1.5 D交替的晶状体值刺激调节3分钟。在双眼条件下,用从9棱镜度(PD)底向外到9 PD底向内交替的棱镜值刺激集合。单眼和双眼任务均导致TA显著降低。这些结果表明,先前报道的持续单眼调节或双眼集合后基线TA的降低可能是调节系统疲劳所致。调节疲劳可能是在对持续调节或集合努力的反适应反应中观察到的较低TA值的原因。