Pal S, Bhattacharya K F, Agapito C, Chaudhuri K R
Regional Movement Disorders Unit, King's College Hospital, University Hospital of Lewisham and Guy's King's & St Thomas' School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2001;108(1):71-7. doi: 10.1007/s007020170098.
To determine if therapy with an ergot and a non-ergot dopamine agonist and levodopa confers an increased risk of excessive daytime sleepiness and secondary "sleep attacks" in Parkinson's disease (PD).
Comparative study of three clinical groups taking, pramipexole (Group 1, n = 19, 8 monotherapy), cabergoline (Group 2, n = 22, 10 monotherapy), and levodopa monotherapy (Group 3, n = 14). Clinical and demographic characteristics, occurrence of "sleep attacks", and assessment of daytime sleepiness [using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)], recorded.
No patients reported "sleep attacks". Mean ESS scores: Group 1 (pramipexole) 8.0 +/- 4.5 (range 0-16), Group 2 (cabergoline) 8.1 +/- 3.9 (range 0-19), Group 3 (levodopa), 8.1 +/- 5.5 (range 1-18). There was no significant difference between groups (p = 0.897). Scores of > or = 16 indicating excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) were evenly distributed throughout treatment groups, particularly in older patients with more advanced disease.
a) EDS is not unique to pramipexole therapy and occurs with both cabergoline and levodopa. b) Increasing age, advanced disease, and higher treatment dose appear important predictors for EDS. c) Driving regulations should be reviewed accordingly.
确定使用麦角类和非麦角类多巴胺激动剂及左旋多巴进行治疗是否会增加帕金森病(PD)患者日间过度嗜睡及继发性“睡眠发作”的风险。
对三组临床患者进行比较研究,分别服用普拉克索(第1组,n = 19,8例单药治疗)、卡麦角林(第2组,n = 22,10例单药治疗)和左旋多巴单药治疗(第3组,n = 14)。记录临床和人口统计学特征、“睡眠发作”的发生情况以及日间嗜睡评估[使用爱泼沃斯嗜睡量表(ESS)]。
无患者报告“睡眠发作”。ESS平均得分:第1组(普拉克索)8.0±4.5(范围0 - 16),第2组(卡麦角林)8.1±3.9(范围0 - 19),第3组(左旋多巴)8.1±5.5(范围1 - 18)。组间无显著差异(p = 0.897)。得分≥16表明存在日间过度嗜睡(EDS),在各治疗组中分布均匀,尤其在病情更严重的老年患者中。
a)EDS并非普拉克索治疗所特有,卡麦角林和左旋多巴治疗时也会出现。b)年龄增长、病情严重及治疗剂量增加似乎是EDS的重要预测因素。c)应相应审查驾驶规定。