Suppr超能文献

一项关于三组接受普拉克索、卡麦角林以及左旋多巴单药治疗和联合治疗的帕金森病患者日间过度嗜睡及其临床意义的研究。

A study of excessive daytime sleepiness and its clinical significance in three groups of Parkinson's disease patients taking pramipexole, cabergoline and levodopa mono and combination therapy.

作者信息

Pal S, Bhattacharya K F, Agapito C, Chaudhuri K R

机构信息

Regional Movement Disorders Unit, King's College Hospital, University Hospital of Lewisham and Guy's King's & St Thomas' School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2001;108(1):71-7. doi: 10.1007/s007020170098.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if therapy with an ergot and a non-ergot dopamine agonist and levodopa confers an increased risk of excessive daytime sleepiness and secondary "sleep attacks" in Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

Comparative study of three clinical groups taking, pramipexole (Group 1, n = 19, 8 monotherapy), cabergoline (Group 2, n = 22, 10 monotherapy), and levodopa monotherapy (Group 3, n = 14). Clinical and demographic characteristics, occurrence of "sleep attacks", and assessment of daytime sleepiness [using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)], recorded.

RESULTS

No patients reported "sleep attacks". Mean ESS scores: Group 1 (pramipexole) 8.0 +/- 4.5 (range 0-16), Group 2 (cabergoline) 8.1 +/- 3.9 (range 0-19), Group 3 (levodopa), 8.1 +/- 5.5 (range 1-18). There was no significant difference between groups (p = 0.897). Scores of > or = 16 indicating excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) were evenly distributed throughout treatment groups, particularly in older patients with more advanced disease.

CONCLUSIONS

a) EDS is not unique to pramipexole therapy and occurs with both cabergoline and levodopa. b) Increasing age, advanced disease, and higher treatment dose appear important predictors for EDS. c) Driving regulations should be reviewed accordingly.

摘要

目的

确定使用麦角类和非麦角类多巴胺激动剂及左旋多巴进行治疗是否会增加帕金森病(PD)患者日间过度嗜睡及继发性“睡眠发作”的风险。

方法

对三组临床患者进行比较研究,分别服用普拉克索(第1组,n = 19,8例单药治疗)、卡麦角林(第2组,n = 22,10例单药治疗)和左旋多巴单药治疗(第3组,n = 14)。记录临床和人口统计学特征、“睡眠发作”的发生情况以及日间嗜睡评估[使用爱泼沃斯嗜睡量表(ESS)]。

结果

无患者报告“睡眠发作”。ESS平均得分:第1组(普拉克索)8.0±4.5(范围0 - 16),第2组(卡麦角林)8.1±3.9(范围0 - 19),第3组(左旋多巴)8.1±5.5(范围1 - 18)。组间无显著差异(p = 0.897)。得分≥16表明存在日间过度嗜睡(EDS),在各治疗组中分布均匀,尤其在病情更严重的老年患者中。

结论

a)EDS并非普拉克索治疗所特有,卡麦角林和左旋多巴治疗时也会出现。b)年龄增长、病情严重及治疗剂量增加似乎是EDS的重要预测因素。c)应相应审查驾驶规定。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验