• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估癫痫发作和癫痫的严重程度:哪些量表是有效的?

Assessing the severity of seizures and epilepsy: which scales are valid?

作者信息

Cramer J A

机构信息

Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Neurol. 2001 Apr;14(2):225-9. doi: 10.1097/00019052-200104000-00015.

DOI:10.1097/00019052-200104000-00015
PMID:11262740
Abstract

A review of the literature on methods of seizure or epilepsy severity assessments resulted in tabulation of the seizure rating scales known as US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Chalfont-National Hospital, Liverpool, Hague, and others. Each of the scales reviewed has some advantages, but none of them appears to be adequate to assess seizure or epilepsy severity. Most of the scales use similar components of seizures to evaluate severity. However, the disadvantages of each scale outweigh its usefulness. New approaches are needed to assess seizure severity for individuals and for use as an outcome measure after intervention such as surgery or medication changes.

摘要

对有关癫痫发作或癫痫严重程度评估方法的文献进行综述后,整理出了被称为美国退伍军人事务部(VA)、查尔方特-利物浦国家医院、海牙等的癫痫发作评分量表。所综述的每个量表都有一些优点,但似乎没有一个足以评估癫痫发作或癫痫的严重程度。大多数量表使用类似的癫痫发作成分来评估严重程度。然而,每个量表的缺点都超过了其有用性。需要新的方法来评估个体的癫痫发作严重程度,并用作手术或药物改变等干预后的结果指标。

相似文献

1
Assessing the severity of seizures and epilepsy: which scales are valid?评估癫痫发作和癫痫的严重程度:哪些量表是有效的?
Curr Opin Neurol. 2001 Apr;14(2):225-9. doi: 10.1097/00019052-200104000-00015.
2
Quantitative assessment of seizure severity for clinical trials: a review of approaches to seizure components.临床试验中癫痫发作严重程度的定量评估:癫痫发作成分评估方法综述
Epilepsia. 2001 Jan;42(1):119-29. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.19400.x.
3
A clinimetric approach to assessing quality of life in epilepsy.一种评估癫痫患者生活质量的临床测量方法。
Epilepsia. 1993;34 Suppl 4:S8-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1993.tb05917.x.
4
The National Hospital Seizure Severity Scale: a further development of the Chalfont Seizure Severity Scale.
Epilepsia. 1996 Jun;37(6):563-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1996.tb00610.x.
5
Adaptation and evaluation of the Liverpool Seizure Severity Scale and Liverpool Quality of Life battery for American epilepsy patients.
Qual Life Res. 1998 May;7(4):353-63. doi: 10.1023/a:1024942215515.
6
Adaptation and evaluation of the Liverpool Seizure Severity Scale and Liverpool Quality of Life battery for American epilepsy patients.针对美国癫痫患者对利物浦癫痫发作严重程度量表和利物浦生活质量量表进行改编与评估。
Qual Life Res. 1998 Aug;7(6):467-77. doi: 10.1023/a:1008834710146.
7
Parent-completed scales for measuring seizure severity and severity of side-effects of antiepileptic drugs in childhood epilepsy: development and psychometric analysis.用于测量儿童癫痫发作严重程度及抗癫痫药物副作用严重程度的家长完成式量表:编制与心理测量分析
Epilepsy Res. 1996 Jul;24(3):173-81. doi: 10.1016/0920-1211(96)00012-5.
8
The determinants of seizure severity in Nigerian epileptics.尼日利亚癫痫患者发作严重程度的决定因素。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2005 Dec;8(2):94-6.
9
Validation of a new quality of life measure for children with epilepsy.一种针对癫痫患儿的新的生活质量测量方法的验证。
Epilepsia. 2000 Jun;41(6):765-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb00240.x.
10
Developing the Pediatric Refractory Epilepsy Questionnaire: a pilot study.编制儿童难治性癫痫问卷:一项试点研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2014 Aug;37:26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.04.025. Epub 2014 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of clinician- and caregiver-reported clinical severity assessments for individuals with CDKL5 deficiency disorder.CDKL5 缺乏症患者的临床医生和照顾者报告的临床严重程度评估的心理测量学评估。
Epilepsia. 2024 Oct;65(10):3064-3075. doi: 10.1111/epi.18094. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
2
Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) assessment in epilepsy: a review of epilepsy-specific PROs according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory requirements.癫痫患者报告结局(PRO)评估:根据美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)监管要求评估的癫痫专用 PRO 综述。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Mar 11;11:38. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-38.