Harris A D, Karchmer T B, Carmeli Y, Samore M H
Dept. of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Apr 1;32(7):1055-61. doi: 10.1086/319600. Epub 2001 Mar 21.
Case-control studies that analyze the risk factors for antibiotic-resistant organisms have varied epidemiological methodologies, which may lead to biased estimates of antibiotic risk factors. A systematic review of case-control studies that analyzed risk factors for antibiotic-resistant organisms addressed 3 methodological principles: method of control group selection, adjustment for time at risk, and adjustment for comorbid illness. A total of 406 abstracts were reviewed. Thirty-seven studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were reviewed and evaluated for the 3 methodological principles. Thirteen (35%) of 37 studies chose the preferred control group. Eleven adjusted for time at risk. Twenty-seven adjusted for comorbid illness. Future studies need to consider more closely the optimization of control group selection, adjusting for confounding caused by time at risk, and adjusting for confounding caused by comorbid illness.
分析抗生素耐药菌危险因素的病例对照研究采用了多种流行病学方法,这可能导致对抗生素危险因素的估计出现偏差。一项对分析抗生素耐药菌危险因素的病例对照研究的系统评价涉及3条方法学原则:对照组选择方法、风险时间调整以及合并症调整。共审查了406篇摘要。37项研究符合纳入和排除标准,并针对这3条方法学原则进行了审查和评估。37项研究中有13项(35%)选择了首选对照组。11项对风险时间进行了调整。27项对合并症进行了调整。未来的研究需要更密切地考虑优化对照组选择、调整风险时间造成的混杂以及调整合并症造成的混杂。