Healey F, Persinger M A
Behavioral Neuroscience Laboratory, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Int J Neurosci. 2001;106(3-4):195-207. doi: 10.3109/00207450109149749.
This experiment was designed to discern the proportion of false, inferential and verbatim memories that would be included in the reconstruction, one week later, of a 5 min narrative containing ambiguous but emotional content about a little boy. After 48 subjects were administered Spiegel's Hypnosis Induction Profile, they listened to the narrative, were exposed to one of four applications of transcerebral weak, complex magnetic fields for 30 min and then given either an accurate or inaccurate short summary of the story. One week later the group who received the erroneous summary reported more false memories about the original story than did the reference group; this treatment accommodated about 40% of the variance in numbers of false memories. Only an indicator of electrical lability within the temporal lobes (but not hypnotizability) was strongly associated with the numbers of inferential memories but not the numbers of false memories. The group that received transcerebral stimulation over the right hemisphere by a complex magnetic field and the erroneous summary reported three times the numbers of false memories compared to the other groups. Whereas verbatim memories showed a strong primacy effect inferential memories exhibited a strong recency effect (eta(2) =.66).
本实验旨在辨别在一周后对一段关于小男孩的时长5分钟、内容模糊但带有情感的叙述进行重构时,虚假记忆、推理记忆和逐字记忆在其中所占的比例。48名受试者接受斯皮格尔催眠诱导量表测试后,听取了该叙述,然后接受四种经颅弱复合磁场应用中的一种,持续30分钟,之后被给予该故事的准确或不准确简短总结。一周后,收到错误总结的组比参照组报告了更多关于原始故事的虚假记忆;这种处理方式解释了虚假记忆数量差异的约40%。仅颞叶内的电易感性指标(而非催眠易感性)与推理记忆的数量密切相关,与虚假记忆的数量无关。与其他组相比,接受右半球经颅复合磁场刺激并收到错误总结的组报告的虚假记忆数量是其他组的三倍。逐字记忆呈现出强烈的首因效应,而推理记忆则呈现出强烈的近因效应(η² = 0.66)。