Harno K, Paavola T, Carlson C, Viikinkoski P
Department of Internal Medicine, Peijas Hospital, Vantaa, Finland.
J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6(6):320-9. doi: 10.1258/1357633001935996.
The clinical effectiveness and costs of telemedicine in improving the referral process from primary to secondary care were examined in an eight-month prospective, comparative study with one-year follow-up. The internal-medicine outpatient clinics of two Finnish district hospitals were compared--Peijas Hospital (PH) with telemedicine and Hyvinkää Hospital (HH) without it. The three primary-care centres studied referred a total of 292 adult patients to the outpatient clinics. The population-based number of referrals to PH (7.5/1000) from primary-care centres was twice that to HH (3.8/1000). Thirty-seven per cent of referrals to PH included requests from general practitioners for on-line medical advice (teleconsultation). Forty-three per cent of the total number of intranet referrals resulted in outpatient visits at PH, compared with 79% in the outpatient clinic at HH. Only 18% of the patients receiving a teleconsultation ended up in the outpatient department of PH within one year. These visits were mainly due to progression of chronic disease. No deaths or missed diagnoses could be attributed to telemedicine, but one diagnosis was delayed. The direct costs of an outpatient clinic visit in internal medicine (EU211) were seven times greater per patient than for an e-mail consultation (EU32), with a marginal cost decrease of EU179 for every new intranet consultation. A cost-minimization analysis of the alternative interventions showed a net benefit of EU7876 in favour of the teleconsultation process. General practitioners sought an outpatient visit for 130 of their patients, and advice only for another 77. On-line advice was nonetheless given in 108 cases, and only 88 patient visits were arranged. Eleven referrals were declined. The cost difference between giving on-line medical advice for the 108 cases and a visit to the outpatient clinic for the other 88 was less costly (by EU4140) than investigating the 124 patients whose original clinic referrals to the PH were not declined. Productivity in the hospital increased over threefold by using e-mail consultations instead of traditional outpatient visits. The wide interactive use of the intranet referral system between secondary and primary care improved clinical effectiveness, lowered direct costs, increased productivity and was cost-effective.
在一项为期八个月的前瞻性对比研究及一年的随访中,对远程医疗在改善从初级医疗到二级医疗的转诊流程方面的临床效果和成本进行了研究。比较了芬兰两家地区医院的内科门诊——采用远程医疗的佩亚斯医院(PH)和未采用远程医疗的海文卡医院(HH)。所研究的三个初级医疗中心共向门诊转诊了292名成年患者。基于人口的初级医疗中心向PH的转诊数量(7.5/1000)是向HH转诊数量(3.8/1000)的两倍。向PH的转诊中有37%包括全科医生寻求在线医疗建议(远程会诊)。在内联网转诊总数中,43%的转诊患者最终在PH门诊就诊,而在HH门诊这一比例为79%。在接受远程会诊的患者中,只有18%在一年内最终前往PH门诊部就诊。这些就诊主要是由于慢性病的进展。没有死亡或漏诊可归因于远程医疗,但有一例诊断延迟。内科门诊就诊的直接成本(211欧元)是电子邮件咨询成本(32欧元)的七倍,每增加一次内联网咨询,边际成本降低179欧元。对替代干预措施的成本最小化分析显示,远程会诊流程净收益为7876欧元。全科医生为130名患者寻求门诊就诊,为另外77名患者仅寻求建议。尽管如此,仍进行了108例在线建议,仅安排了88次患者就诊。11例转诊被拒绝。为108例患者提供在线医疗建议与为另外88例患者安排门诊就诊之间的成本差异,比调查124例最初转诊至PH门诊且未被拒绝的患者成本更低(低4140欧元)。通过使用电子邮件咨询而非传统门诊就诊,医院的生产率提高了三倍多。二级医疗和初级医疗之间对内联网转诊系统的广泛互动使用提高了临床效果,降低了直接成本,提高了生产率且具有成本效益。