Suppr超能文献

淋巴绘图中皮内注射与皮下注射的比较。

Comparison of intradermal and subcutaneous injections in lymphatic mapping.

作者信息

Kersey T W, Van Eyk J, Lannin D R, Chua A N, Tafra L

机构信息

The Breast Center, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, Maryland 21401, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2001 Apr;96(2):255-9. doi: 10.1006/jsre.2000.6075.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for melanoma, with its intradermal (ID) injection, has a higher success rate than SNB for breast cancer, which is typically performed with a subcutaneous (SC) or peritumor injection. It is hypothesized that this is in part due to a slower transit time of lymphatic mapping agents through the parenchymal lymphatics of the breast. No study has investigated differences in transit time between different tissues to account for this clinical observation. The goal of the study was to compare transit time between ID and SC injections with common agents used in lymphatic mapping.

METHODS

Four injection sites on five domestic pigs were used. Sites were bilateral and included cervical, forelimb, hindlimb, and flank areas. Agents included technetium sulfur colloid (Tc99, filtered and unfiltered), isosulfan blue (IB) dye, and fluorescein (FL) dye. At each site both ID and SC injections were made and the transit time to reach the sentinel node was recorded. The transit time differences were calculated per centimeter distance from the draining lymph node basin.

RESULTS

Sentinel nodes were identified draining all sites and found to be hot, blue, or fluorescent (using a Wood's lamp for identification). The cervical and forelimb injection sites drained to the same cervical lymph node basin and both SC and ID injection sites drained to the same sentinel node. Similarly, the hindlimb and flank injection sites both drained to inguinal lymph node basins. The slowest transit time occurred with Tc99 injected SC and the fastest occurred with Tc99 injected ID, whereas both FL dye and IB traveled rapidly to the sentinel node whether injected SC or ID. Large differences were found using unfiltered Tc99 depending on its injection ID (2.7 s/cm +/- 0.5) vs SC (249 s/cm +/- 14.7, P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Tc99 ID injections were significantly faster than SC injection. The slowest and fastest SC injection agents were unfiltered Tc99 and IB, respectively. Dermal injections provide faster transit of lymphatic agents and may improve the identification rate when applied to patients with breast cancer.

摘要

背景

黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结活检(SNB)采用皮内(ID)注射,其成功率高于乳腺癌的SNB,后者通常采用皮下(SC)或瘤周注射。据推测,部分原因是淋巴示踪剂通过乳腺实质淋巴管的转运时间较慢。尚无研究调查不同组织间转运时间的差异以解释这一临床观察结果。本研究的目的是比较ID和SC注射以及淋巴示踪常用试剂的转运时间。

方法

使用5头家猪的4个注射部位。部位为双侧,包括颈部、前肢、后肢和胁腹区域。试剂包括锝硫胶体(Tc99,过滤和未过滤的)、异硫蓝(IB)染料和荧光素(FL)染料。在每个部位进行ID和SC注射,并记录到达前哨淋巴结的转运时间。根据距引流淋巴结区域的厘米距离计算转运时间差异。

结果

确定了引流所有部位的前哨淋巴结,发现其呈热、蓝色或荧光(使用伍德灯进行识别)。颈部和前肢注射部位引流至同一颈部淋巴结区域,SC和ID注射部位均引流至同一个前哨淋巴结。同样,后肢和胁腹注射部位均引流至腹股沟淋巴结区域。转运时间最慢的是SC注射的未过滤Tc99,最快的是ID注射的Tc99,而FL染料和IB无论SC还是ID注射均快速到达前哨淋巴结。使用未过滤的Tc99时,根据其ID注射(2.7秒/厘米±0.5)与SC注射(249秒/厘米±14.7,P = 0.008)发现有很大差异。

结论

Tc99的ID注射明显快于SC注射。最慢和最快的SC注射试剂分别是未过滤的Tc99和IB。皮内注射可使淋巴试剂转运更快,应用于乳腺癌患者时可能提高识别率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验