• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孕中期因胎儿异常或死亡而终止妊娠:米非司酮/米索前列醇与吉美前列素的比较

Second trimester termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly or death: comparing mifepristone/misoprostol to gemeprost.

作者信息

le Roux P A, Pahal G S, Hoffman L, Nooh R, El-Refaey H, Rodeck C H

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001 Mar;95(1):52-4. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(00)00365-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0301-2115(00)00365-1
PMID:11267720
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of changing the regimen for second trimester induction of labour from gemeprost to mifepristone/misoprostol.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A retrospective study at a university teaching hospital over the 5-year period 1993-1997. SUBJECTS, METHODS and REGIMENS: 68 patients, 34 in the gemeprost group and 34 in the mifepristone/misoprostol group. The gemeprost group received 1mg vaginally every 3h to a maximum of five doses. The mifepristone/misoprostol group were pre-treated with 600 mg mifepristone orally followed by 800 microg misoprostol vaginally and then 400 microg orally every 3h to a maximum of four oral doses.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Induction to abortion interval; delivery within 24h.

RESULTS

The mifepristone/misoprostol group had a lower induction to abortion interval compared to the gemeprost group (median 8.9h versus 19.8h, respectively, p<0.01). The mifepristone/misoprostol regimen was more successful than the gemeprost regimen; 94% versus 68%, respectively, aborted without extra medical or surgical intervention, p=0.02. There were no significant differences in side effects, analgesia requirements or complications between the two groups. Three patients with previous Caesarean sections had a ruptured uterus; two from the gemeprost group and one from the mifepristone/misoprostol group.

CONCLUSIONS

The new mifepristone/misoprostol regimen was more effective in second trimester induction of labour. Induction of labour with misoprostol or gemeprost should be used with care in patients with a previous Caesarean section.

摘要

目的

评估将孕中期引产方案从吉美前列素改为米非司酮/米索前列醇的效果。

设计与地点

1993年至1997年在一家大学教学医院进行的回顾性研究。对象、方法与方案:68例患者,吉美前列素组34例,米非司酮/米索前列醇组34例。吉美前列素组每3小时阴道给予1mg,最大剂量为5剂。米非司酮/米索前列醇组先口服600mg米非司酮,然后阴道给予800μg米索前列醇,随后每3小时口服400μg,最大口服剂量为4剂。

主要观察指标

引产至流产间隔时间;24小时内分娩。

结果

米非司酮/米索前列醇组的引产至流产间隔时间比吉美前列素组短(中位数分别为8.9小时和19.8小时,p<0.01)。米非司酮/米索前列醇方案比吉美前列素方案更成功;分别有94%和68%的患者在无需额外医疗或手术干预的情况下流产,p = 0.02。两组在副作用、镇痛需求或并发症方面无显著差异。3例有剖宫产史的患者发生子宫破裂;吉美前列素组2例,米非司酮/米索前列醇组1例。

结论

新的米非司酮/米索前列醇方案在孕中期引产中更有效。对于有剖宫产史的患者,使用米索前列醇或吉美前列素引产时应谨慎。

相似文献

1
Second trimester termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly or death: comparing mifepristone/misoprostol to gemeprost.孕中期因胎儿异常或死亡而终止妊娠:米非司酮/米索前列醇与吉美前列素的比较
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001 Mar;95(1):52-4. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(00)00365-1.
2
The abortifacient effect of misoprostol in the second trimester. A randomized comparison with gemeprost in patients pre-treated with mifepristone (RU486).米索前列醇在孕中期的堕胎效果。与米非司酮(RU486)预处理患者中吉美前列素的随机对照比较。
Hum Reprod. 1993 Oct;8(10):1744-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137927.
3
A randomised study of misoprostol and gemeprost in combination with mifepristone for induction of abortion in the second trimester of pregnancy.米索前列醇与吉美前列素联合米非司酮用于妊娠中期引产的随机研究。
BJOG. 2002 Nov;109(11):1290-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2002.01462.x.
4
Misoprostol versus cervagem for the induction of labour to terminate pregnancy in the second and third trimester: a systematic review.米索前列醇与宫颈扩张球囊用于孕中期和孕晚期引产终止妊娠的系统评价
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Mar 1;125(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.10.021. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
5
Vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal gemeprost in termination of second trimester pregnancy. A randomized trial.米索前列醇阴道给药与吉美前列素阴道给药用于中期妊娠终止的比较:一项随机试验
Contraception. 1998 Oct;58(4):207-10. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00099-7.
6
Double-blind randomized trial of mifepristone in combination with vaginal gemeprost or misoprostol for induction of abortion up to 63 days gestation.米非司酮联合阴道用吉美前列素或米索前列醇用于妊娠63天内引产的双盲随机试验。
Hum Reprod. 2001 Oct;16(10):2098-102. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.10.2098.
7
Comparative study of intravaginal misoprostol with gemeprost as an abortifacient in second trimester missed abortion.米索前列醇与吉美前列素用于中期妊娠稽留流产引产的对比研究
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Aug;37(3):331-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1997.tb02424.x.
8
Misoprostol is as effective as gemeprost in termination of second trimester pregnancy when combined with mifepristone: a randomised comparative trial.米索前列醇与米非司酮联合用于终止中期妊娠时,其效果与吉美前列素相同:一项随机对照试验。
Contraception. 1996 May;53(5):281-3.
9
[Mifepristone for induction of second trimester abortion].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2003 Sep 11;123(17):2412-3.
10
A randomised study of two doses of gemeprost in combination with mifepristone for induction of abortion in the second trimester of pregnancy.两种剂量米索前列醇联合米非司酮用于妊娠中期引产的随机研究。
Contraception. 1996 Aug;54(2):97-100. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(96)00132-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the outcomes of termination of second trimester pregnancy with a live fetus using intravaginal misoprostol between women with and without previous cesarean section.比较有和无剖宫产史孕妇经阴道使用米索前列醇终止中期妊娠活胎的结局。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Apr 12;24(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06442-x.
2
Uterine rupture after prostaglandin analogues to induce midtrimester abortion.使用前列腺素类似物诱导中期妊娠流产后子宫破裂
J Prenat Med. 2010 Jan;4(1):9-11.