Suppr超能文献

对豚草致敏患者进行舌下免疫治疗的效果。一项开放性对照研究。

Effects of sublingual immunotherapy in patients sensitised to Ambrosia. An open controlled study.

作者信息

Valle C, Bazzi S, Berra D, Sillano V, Puccinelli P, Parmiani S

机构信息

Ospedale S. Paolo, Ambulatorio di Allergologia, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2000 Nov-Dec;28(6):311-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Allergy to Ambrosia is a disease of growing importance in Europe. Injective and non-injective immunotherapy have been recognised as safe and effective but no evidence is currently available for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in patients sensitised to Ambrosia. This study was planned to assess the effects and the safety of SLIT in patients clinically sensitised to Ambrosia.

METHODS

19 patients clinically sensitised to Ambrosia and treated with SLIT were compared to 14 patients treated only with drugs. Diary cards with symptoms and drug consumption were filled-in by patients during the pollen season whereas specific nasal challenge and skin prick test were run two months before and after the pollen season. Patients and doctors were also asked to express their subjective assessment about symptoms and drug consumption during the season.

RESULTS

SLIT-treated patients had less symptoms and a significantly minor drug intake (p = 0.04) as compared to untreated patients. Nasal challenge test improved significantly in the SLIT group (p = 0.0001) but not in the control group (p = 0.6875) with a significant difference between groups at the end (p = 0.0413) but not at the beginning of the trial (p = 0.213). The decrease in skin reactivity was significant in the control group (p = 0.0186) and highly significant in the SLIT group (p < 0.0001), with no difference between groups (p = 0.2987). Subjective assessment from both patients and doctors was favorable to SLIT (p = 0.0005 for symptoms; p = 0.0019 for drug consumption). Only one minor local side effect was registered during SLIT.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our data, SLIT in patients allergic to Ambrosia is safe and able to improve both subjective and objective parameters.

摘要

背景

在欧洲,对豚草过敏的疾病日益重要。注射和非注射免疫疗法已被认为是安全有效的,但目前尚无针对豚草致敏患者的舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)的证据。本研究旨在评估SLIT对临床豚草致敏患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

将19例临床豚草致敏并接受SLIT治疗的患者与14例仅接受药物治疗的患者进行比较。患者在花粉季节填写症状和药物使用情况的日记卡,而在花粉季节前后两个月进行特异性鼻激发试验和皮肤点刺试验。还要求患者和医生对季节期间的症状和药物使用情况进行主观评估。

结果

与未治疗的患者相比,接受SLIT治疗的患者症状较少,药物摄入量显著减少(p = 0.04)。SLIT组的鼻激发试验有显著改善(p = 0.0001),而对照组无改善(p = 0.6875),试验结束时两组间有显著差异(p = 0.0413),但试验开始时无差异(p = 0.213)。对照组皮肤反应性降低显著(p = 0.0186),SLIT组高度显著(p < 0.0001),两组间无差异(p = 0.2987)。患者和医生的主观评估均有利于SLIT(症状p = 0.0005;药物使用p = 0.0019)。SLIT期间仅记录到1例轻微局部副作用。

结论

根据我们的数据,对豚草过敏患者的SLIT是安全的,并且能够改善主观和客观参数。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验