Margarit C, Lázaro J L, Balsells J, Charco R, Murio E, Edo A, Gifre E
Unidad de Transplante Hepático, Servicio de Cirugía General Hospital General Vall de Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain.
Transpl Int. 1994;7 Suppl 1:S152-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.1994.tb01335.x.
Recipient hepatectomy with inferior vena cava (IVC) preservation, the piggy back (PGB) technique, was adopted as our routine option in the management of the anhepatic phase of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) to avoid the use of veno-venous bypass (VV-BP). In the last 5 years, 119 OLT in adult patients have been performed in our unit. In the first period (47 OLT), VV-BP was used in 59% of the cases and cross-clamping in the rest. In the second period, following the introduction of the PGB technique, 72 OLT were performed. VV-BP was used in 5.5% of the cases, PGB technique in 87.5% and cross-clamping in 6.9%. There was a significant reduction in the need for VV-BP in the second period. Operating time and blood transfusion were significantly greater in the VV-BP group. No PGB technique related complications were observed. In conclusion, the PGB technique reduced the need for VVBP with consequent savings in time, blood transfusion and the cost of OLT.
在原位肝移植(OLT)的无肝期管理中,我们采用保留肝下下腔静脉(IVC)的受体肝切除术即背驮式(PGB)技术,以避免使用静脉-静脉转流(VV-BP)。在过去5年里,我们单位为成年患者实施了119例OLT。在第一阶段(47例OLT),59%的病例使用了VV-BP,其余病例采用交叉钳夹。在第二阶段,随着PGB技术的引入,实施了72例OLT。5.5%的病例使用了VV-BP,87.5%的病例采用了PGB技术,6.9%的病例采用了交叉钳夹。第二阶段对VV-BP的需求显著减少。VV-BP组的手术时间和输血量明显更多。未观察到与PGB技术相关的并发症。总之,PGB技术减少了对VVBP的需求,从而节省了时间、输血量和OLT的费用。