Suppr超能文献

保留下腔静脉的受体肝切除术可减少肝移植中静脉-静脉转流的需求。

Recipient hepatectomy with preservation of inferior vena cava reduces the need for veno-venous bypass in liver transplantation.

作者信息

Margarit C, Lázaro J L, Balsells J, Charco R, Murio E, Edo A, Gifre E

机构信息

Unidad de Transplante Hepático, Servicio de Cirugía General Hospital General Vall de Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Transpl Int. 1994;7 Suppl 1:S152-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.1994.tb01335.x.

Abstract

Recipient hepatectomy with inferior vena cava (IVC) preservation, the piggy back (PGB) technique, was adopted as our routine option in the management of the anhepatic phase of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) to avoid the use of veno-venous bypass (VV-BP). In the last 5 years, 119 OLT in adult patients have been performed in our unit. In the first period (47 OLT), VV-BP was used in 59% of the cases and cross-clamping in the rest. In the second period, following the introduction of the PGB technique, 72 OLT were performed. VV-BP was used in 5.5% of the cases, PGB technique in 87.5% and cross-clamping in 6.9%. There was a significant reduction in the need for VV-BP in the second period. Operating time and blood transfusion were significantly greater in the VV-BP group. No PGB technique related complications were observed. In conclusion, the PGB technique reduced the need for VVBP with consequent savings in time, blood transfusion and the cost of OLT.

摘要

在原位肝移植(OLT)的无肝期管理中,我们采用保留肝下下腔静脉(IVC)的受体肝切除术即背驮式(PGB)技术,以避免使用静脉-静脉转流(VV-BP)。在过去5年里,我们单位为成年患者实施了119例OLT。在第一阶段(47例OLT),59%的病例使用了VV-BP,其余病例采用交叉钳夹。在第二阶段,随着PGB技术的引入,实施了72例OLT。5.5%的病例使用了VV-BP,87.5%的病例采用了PGB技术,6.9%的病例采用了交叉钳夹。第二阶段对VV-BP的需求显著减少。VV-BP组的手术时间和输血量明显更多。未观察到与PGB技术相关的并发症。总之,PGB技术减少了对VVBP的需求,从而节省了时间、输血量和OLT的费用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验