D'Silva M, Candinas D, Achilleos O, Lee S J, Dalgic A, Miki C, Mayer A D, McMaster P
Liver Research Laboratories, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Transpl Int. 1994;7 Suppl 1:S378-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.1994.tb01396.x.
We assessed the immunomodulatory effect of leflunomide (LEF) in a heterotopic abdominal model of rat heart transplantation using a major histocompatibility mismatch (DA X LEW). The endpoint of this study was cardiac rejection assessed by abdominal palpation of the ventricular impulse and confirmed by laparotomy and histology. In this study, LF was investigated using four dosages (5, 10, 20 and 30 mg/kg per day orally) against cyclosporine (CsA) (15 mg/kg per day orally) and FK 506 (1 mg/kg per day orally). The ability of LEF to prevent rejection and reverse ongoing acute rejection was assessed. The results showed that untreated hearts were fully rejected by day 5 and that LEF at 5 mg/kg was significantly better than any other dose tested, was superior to FK 1 mg/kg, and was as effective as CsA 15 mg/kg in preventing rejection after a short course of treatment. After a longer course, 10 and 20 mg/kg LEF proved more effective than 5 mg/kg in controlling rejection and as efficacious as 1 mg/kg FK and 15 mg/kg CsA. In the control of ongoing established early rejection. LEF proved to be equally effective, even at lower doses (5 mg/kg), to CsA 15 mg/kg and FK 1 mg/kg. In the control of ongoing established late rejection, 20 mg/kg LEF proved to be superior to 10 mg/kg LEF and 15 mg/kg CsA, and was as effective as FK 1 mg/kg. However, when higher doses of CsA (25 mg/kg) and FK (2 mg/kg) were tested against 20 mg/kg LEF in this mode of rescue, LEF proved as effective as CsA and superior to FK. In the assessment of drug toxicity using body weight as a parameter, 20 mg/kg LEF proved safer than any other LEF dose tested, and safer than 15 mg/kg CsA and 1 mg/kg FK in both short- and long term administration. We conclude that LEF is a relatively safe and potent immunosuppressant with promising clinical potential.
我们使用主要组织相容性不匹配(DA×LEW)的大鼠心脏异位腹部移植模型,评估了来氟米特(LEF)的免疫调节作用。本研究的终点是通过腹部触诊心室搏动评估心脏排斥反应,并通过剖腹术和组织学检查加以证实。在本研究中,针对环孢素(CsA)(每天口服15mg/kg)和FK506(每天口服1mg/kg),研究了四种剂量(每天口服5、10、20和30mg/kg)的LEF。评估了LEF预防排斥反应和逆转正在进行的急性排斥反应的能力。结果显示,未经治疗的心脏在第5天时完全被排斥,5mg/kg的LEF明显优于所测试的任何其他剂量,优于1mg/kg的FK,并且在短疗程治疗后预防排斥反应方面与15mg/kg的CsA效果相同。经过更长疗程后,10mg/kg和20mg/kg的LEF在控制排斥反应方面比5mg/kg更有效,并且与1mg/kg的FK和15mg/kg的CsA效果相同。在控制正在进行的已确立的早期排斥反应方面,LEF被证明同样有效,即使在较低剂量(5mg/kg)时,也与15mg/kg的CsA和1mg/kg的FK效果相同。在控制正在进行的已确立的晚期排斥反应方面,20mg/kg的LEF被证明优于10mg/kg的LEF和15mg/kg的CsA,并且与1mg/kg的FK效果相同。然而,当在这种挽救模式下,针对20mg/kg的LEF测试更高剂量的CsA(25mg/kg)和FK(2mg/kg)时,LEF被证明与CsA效果相同且优于FK。在以体重为参数评估药物毒性时,20mg/kg的LEF在短期和长期给药中均被证明比所测试的任何其他LEF剂量更安全,并且比15mg/kg的CsA和1mg/kg的FK更安全。我们得出结论,LEF是一种相对安全且有效的免疫抑制剂,具有广阔的临床应用前景。