van Meurs J B, Arp P P, Fang Y, Slagboom P E, Meulenbelt I, van Leeuwen J P, Pols H A, Uitterlinden A G
Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Electrophoresis. 2000 Nov;21(17):3571-7. doi: 10.1002/1522-2683(200011)21:17<3571::AID-ELPS3571>3.0.CO;2-3.
The variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) 3' of the collagen type II (COL2A1) gene has been shown to be highly variable with a complex molecular structure. In a previous pilot experiment we observed discordance between methods to genotype this informative marker. To further investigate the extent and molecular nature of this discordance, we genotyped a random sample of 207 Caucasian individuals with two genotyping methods and sequenced new alleles. We compared single-strand (SS) analysis, which is based on detection of size differences between the different alleles, and heteroduplex analysis (HA), which is sensitive to both size and sequence differences. Overall, 26% of discordance between the two methods was detected. Approximately two thirds of this discordance was caused by subdivision of SS-alleles 13R1 and 14R2 into HA-alleles 4A + 4B and 3B + 3C, respectively. Sequence analysis of the COL2A1 VNTR alleles 4B and 3C showed that these alleles differed in sequence, but not in size, from already described SS-alleles, which explains why they escape detection by SS. The 4B allele is a frequent allele in the population (14%) and is, therefore, important to distinguish in association studies. We conclude that HA is a reliable method when the described optimized electrophoretic conditions are used. HA is a sensitive genotyping method to document allelic diversity at this locus, which can distinguish more alleles compared to the SS method.
II型胶原蛋白(COL2A1)基因3'端的可变串联重复序列(VNTR)已被证明具有高度变异性,其分子结构复杂。在之前的一项初步实验中,我们观察到对这个信息性标记进行基因分型的方法之间存在不一致性。为了进一步研究这种不一致性的程度和分子本质,我们用两种基因分型方法对207名白种人个体的随机样本进行了基因分型,并对新的等位基因进行了测序。我们比较了基于检测不同等位基因之间大小差异的单链(SS)分析和对大小及序列差异均敏感的异源双链分析(HA)。总体而言,检测到两种方法之间有26%的不一致性。这种不一致性中约三分之二分别是由SS等位基因13R1和14R2细分为HA等位基因4A + 4B和3B + 3C所致。对COL2A1 VNTR等位基因4B和3C的序列分析表明,这些等位基因在序列上与已描述的SS等位基因不同,但在大小上相同,这就解释了它们为何能逃过SS的检测。4B等位基因在人群中是一个常见等位基因(14%),因此在关联研究中进行区分很重要。我们得出结论,当使用所描述的优化电泳条件时,HA是一种可靠的方法。HA是一种灵敏的基因分型方法,可记录该位点的等位基因多样性,与SS方法相比,它能区分更多的等位基因。